Skip to comments.Arkansas Judge Overturns Morality
Posted on 12/29/2004 6:21:54 PM PST by steplock
Arkansas Judge Overturns Morality
Articles / Law & Courts
Dec 29, 2004 - 08:02 PM
|On December 29, 2004. Judge Tim Fox in Little Rock declared that Arkansas Laws based on the morals of the people are "unconstitutional.
Ruling in a case brought by the Arkansas chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union - ACLU, Pulaski County Circuit Judge Timothy Fox said the state Child Welfare Agency Review board had overstepped its authority by trying to regulate public morality. Fox threw out the state's ban against foster parenthood by gay couples or by households that include a gay adult.
401 West Markham/Room 210
Little Rock, AR 72201
FAX # (501) 340-6047
Definition of Law:
A rule or body of rules of conduct based on the MORALS inherent in human nature and essential to or binding upon human society
A Sept. 20, 2004 order by Pulaski County Circuit Judge Tim Fox removed Presidential Candidate Ralph Nader from the ballot.
Fox ruled that the more than 1,000 people who signed petitions to place Nader's name on the ballot did not formally name him as "their" choice for president.
This article is from Mountain Journal News
The URL for this story is:
While you are saying a prayer for me, you might think about praying for help escaping the lifestyle you have apparently chosen for yourself and/or to condone.
You might choose to read up on the subject in the best handbook for life - called The Bible. IF you don't have one, let me know, I would be glad to get you one.
I was an expert witness supporting the Arkansas regulation prohibiting homosexuals from being foster parents, on the basis of the best interests of the children. But the judge struck down the regulation prohibiting foster parenting by households with a homosexually behaving adult (Howard vs. CWARB case).
I found the trial of Howard v. CWARB to be utterly corrupt because both the plaintiffs and the state were represented by attorneys affiliated with the ACLU. The ACLU brought the plaintiffs case against the state. The state Child Welfare Board was represented by an active ACLU member, namely Kathy Hall.
I know for a fact that the Arkansas Bar has an ongoing investigation of Kathy Hall for this apparent gross conflict of interest. The Arkansas Bar is currently investigating the way in which Kathy Hall very clearly appears to have sabotaged the state's defense.
In another recent Arkansas case involving a homosexual youth, ACLU's Leslie Cooper (plaintiff's lawyer for Howard v. CWARB) and Kathy Hall (defendant's lawyer for Howard v. CWARB) served as co-counsel. I discovered the facts of this on the ACLU website.
I am shocked that Judge Tim Fox did not declare a mistrial because he was notified about this conflict of interest by another attorney in October. The CWARB and the Governor should file for a mistrial because ACLU activist attorneys were representing both the plaintiff and the defendant (the state) in Howard v. CWARB.
Because of their conduct, I just filed suit in Federal Court in Arkansas today against Kathy Hall and the other ACLU attorneys involved in this case.
Unfortunately in his written decision, Judge Tim Fox overlooked the scientific studies I presented as an expert witness in the case that show that the majority of foster children have psychological disorders resulting from their losses and maltreatment, and that any increased source of stress interferes with recovery from psychological disorder. This evidence clearly pertains to the welfare of the foster children which ran counter to the Judge's legal basis for his ruling in which he said the regulation was enforcing morality and did not pertain to the welfare of the child (which is probably why he ignored the scientific evidence I presented).
I hope you can get the truth out to the public on this scandal.
George A. Rekers, Ph.D.
Professor of Neuropsychiatry and Behavioral Science
University of South Carolina School of Medicine
Anyone who will display their sexual perversions openly and then demand that everone cheer them and declare them normal .....
We would not allow a child to be placed in a heterosexual whorehouse either! What about allowing habitual criminals to adopt? Hey - that's only a "lifestyle", no?
If homosexuals are allowed to adopt children, then where do we stop with the abnormal? well -- bestiality is a choice also is it not? sado-masochists? pedophiles?
You will cry that of course we shouldn't put the children in jeapordy with pedophiles, but what the hell do you think NAMBLA is except homosexuals who want the right to rape little boys - and all the homosexual organizations openly endorse NAMBLA (North America Man-Boy Love Assoc - or something like that).
No - homosexuality is NOT NORMAL - otherwise you could procreate (without the aid of another -gasp!- sex). Nature, unaided, culls out the defective.
I know homosexuals, I have friends who are homosexuals and I respect them as people. They don't hide their partners either. But they do not practice perversion openly and corrupt children. I do not accept that from anyone no matter what their preference is.
We should also never allow people with diminished mental capacity to adopt either. People with mental imbalances are dangerous to children.
Let's take this treasonous judge --- if you do not make laws according to the prevailing morals of the communisty - what do you make laws for?
answer: if you are a politician-lawyer-judge --- for whoever pays the highest price! Until "We, the People" enact the Second Amendment again.
Yes it is a problem..any elected state rep or senator can write a law, but the problem I think is we don't have enough senators and reps with the testicular fortitude to pass it through the committee process and into the chambers for a vote...... We need more Republicans in both chambers and we don't have it.
What we need is a movement of ordinary folks calling their Reps and Senators pushing them to realize this ain't going to happen in AR! Children need a mom and a dad (of the opposite sex)! It going to fall back on us the citizens to make them feel the heat! Support your local county Republican Party! Join it, work it, know who your elected officals are and make sure they KNOW you and your VALUES or we will lose this one.
I think we do have enough to get it passed once someone confronts them with it. Even Democrats will vote for it once the choice is before them. Sen. Holt has shown that if you stick to your guns on the right issues, you can take a tremendous, vicious, and personal wave of assaults from the print media and still come out highly popular. The other, more timid, legislators were watching.
Thanks for that first hand report. It sounds like you have uncovered a serious problem. That is what I love about the Freeper network- we have lot's of reporters on the scene
You sure are quick to accuse others of lying, distorting, etc. The Professor was a first hand witness to this event whereas the rest of us are just reading stories.
Since you are so quick to accuse others of lies and distoritions I am sure you won't mind being held to the same standard- I don't believe anything you say on this issue. I don't trust you on it because it is so clear that you are willing to say anything, and be hateful to any number of people, in an effort to justify this wickedness.
Not "all" perhaps- that is you trying to put words in the mouths of others, but a diproportionate number of child molesters ARE homosexuals.
And the judge's ruling is, by definition, the judge's side of the story. With the insanity coming out of the courts these days, I am more inclined to accept the Professor's version.
Save it. A couple of gays cooing over a baby is a far cry from raising a child. I have raised / am raising seven, so I'm qualified to say that.
They need a mother AND a father.......and a moral upbringing. Don't pretend or be naive enough to believe that two gays are capable of that.
Second, I don't have preconceived notions about gays. I know exactly what makes someone gay. It's 100% based upon their sexual preferences for members of their same sex; hardly a reason to celebrate them, and hardly a proper role model in ANY sense for children, especially young children. Kids do need male and female influences in their parents, period. Now do I really have to explain to you why??
I guess laws prohibiting crime and banning public indecency are also unconstitutional now. As I keep saying, liberal judges are the bane of our society.
When you get in an argument of morality with someone who has no moral compass, you just can't win, no matter how true and accurate you are.
We know that if God had intended for Homosexuals to have and raise children, they would be biologically capable of doing just that. But guess what - they can't.
I personally am growing tired of this troll/Christian baiting homosexual and this thread. He/It is trying to get us to look like fools when he/she/it already has nothing to loose.
Hope you all have fun....
And to pjacobs - I pray that some day, you will finally come to the realization that you are a sinner (we all are) and that you need something more than your deviant lifestyle to be complete - and that is the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ who came to this Earth, humbled himself, and died a horrific death to pay for your sins and the sins of the whole world. Without HIM, your short life on this Earth will be followed by an eternity you cannot fathom.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.