[Dimensio]

Since the DHS rule has been removed, what rule right NOW prevents a Michael Jackson/NAMBLA Member/sodomizing ex-con/etc from adopting a child in AR.

What ruled them out before? If you're honestly going to tell me that the DHS policy against allowing foster children in households with homosexuals was the only thing preventing the above scenario from occuring, then I'll tell you that the Arkansas DHS sucks and this is thier comeuppance for trying to swat a fly with a sledgehammer.

Why does a whole policy have to be thrown out for one case?

Because the policy was overbroad. We might as well forbid humans from taking in foster children because some humans are murderers.

It's clear that this ruling is designed to advance the lie that homosexual couples are just like heterosexual couples.

If you need to impose arbitrary and overbearing restrictions on foster parents just to "prove" to yourselves that homosexual couples are inferior to heterosexual couples, then I think that you have some problems with personal insecurity.

We already had an amendment vote on that subject, along with an election. The homosexual side lost.

And so now same-sex couples cannot receive the same legal rights, protections and responsiblities offered to opposite-sex couples. The law on foster children had nothing to do with that.

[pulaskibush]

What ruled them out before? If you're honestly going to tell me that the DHS policy against allowing foster children in households with homosexuals was the only thing preventing the above scenario from occuring, then I'll tell you that the Arkansas DHS sucks and this is thier comeuppance for trying to swat a fly with a sledgehammer.

So it's OK to not have a policy that allows child molesters to adopt kids because it's going to happen anyway? Should we allow insane baby killers adopt too? The DHS policy was NOT the only prevention, but apparently prevention of child-endangerment is of no concern to you.

Because the policy was overbroad. We might as well forbid humans from taking in foster children because some humans are murderers.

Homosexuals should be allowed to adopt children for the same reason anorexics, crack addicts, polygamist, incest people, bestiality people, bulimics, and murderers should not be allowed to adopt children. It exposes the child to a lifestyle of un-natural and harmful behavior. Homosexuality is a behavior, not something one is born with. There is no gay gene.

If you need to impose arbitrary and overbearing restrictions on foster parents just to "prove" to yourselves that homosexual couples are inferior to heterosexual couples, then I think that you have some problems with personal insecurity.

So the majority of Americans are "personally insecure" because we don't allow people that "fist" each other and swap partners every couple of weeks to adopt kids. No wonder your side lost.

And so now same-sex couples cannot receive the same legal rights, protections and responsiblities offered to opposite-sex couples. The law on foster children had nothing to do with that.

Yes it does. It is part of the secular agenda for homosexual privileges. This judicial activism will not be tolerated for much longer. You and your kind may want to pack for Canada or some other secular socialist nation.