Doing 2 days before the wedding shows that he is a spineless and dishonest weasel.
I agree. However, I have revised my opinion after looking closer at what was said - She got "hundreds of thousands of dollars" from assets gained during the marriage, so now I don't see the need for alimony in this case if that is in fact true.
However, I stand by my original statement which is that any "man" who expects a woman to make a home, raise children, and not work, then divorce them and send them on their way with nothing isn't, imho, much of a man at all... but maybe that's just me... ;0)
>>If this loser had not been a weasel, he would have told his "sweet-heart" right up front when they discussed marriage that he expected her to sign a preenup, what the general terms would be, and provide the documents for her review and signature as soon thereafter as possible.<<
And he may have. The article does not cover those subjects.