[jonestown]

"If a gun owner wanted to keep his gun in the car, and park his car on the parking lot adjacent to his place of work, he could have bought the parking lot.
That way he would be paying for what he wanted, rather than expecting the government to deprive someone else for his benefit."
41 Luis Gonzalez



Who is being "deprived" of what; --

-- when an employer is told that he can't infringe on his employees right to carry arm's in the vehicles they drive to work?
jones

---

You're being deprived of the right to freely use someone else's property on your own terms, and since you don't have that right, you are deprived of nothing.
56 Luis

---

Nonsense, -- the employer is unreasonably attemping to deprive employees of a basic right to carry arms.

Our RKBA's is protected by law..

[Luis Gonzalez]

Nonsense is what best describes your entire argument on this, even your most ardent supporter has changed positions on this.

You have no right to enter my property at all, so if you don't like my conditions, don't enter, and your rights AND MINE are safeguarded.