Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Should Not Help Tsunami Victims
Ayn Rand Institute ^ | Dec. 30, 2004 | David Holcberg

Posted on 12/30/2004 1:17:50 PM PST by bruinbirdman

Our money is not the government's to give.

As the death toll mounts in the areas hit by Sunday's tsunami in southern Asia, private organizations and individuals are scrambling to send out money and goods to help the victims. Such help may be entirely proper, especially considering that most of those affected by this tragedy are suffering through no fault of their own.

The United States government, however, should not give any money to help the tsunami victims. Why? Because the money is not the government's to give.

Every cent the government spends comes from taxation. Every dollar the government hands out as foreign aid has to be extorted from an American taxpayer first. Year after year, for decades, the government has forced American taxpayers to provide foreign aid to every type of natural or man-made disaster on the face of the earth: from the Marshall Plan to reconstruct a war-ravaged Europe to the $15 billion recently promised to fight AIDS in Africa to the countless amounts spent to help the victims of earthquakes, fires and floods--from South America to Asia. Even the enemies of the United States were given money extorted from American taxpayers: from the billions given away by Clinton to help the starving North Koreans to the billions given away by Bush to help the blood-thirsty Palestinians under Arafat's murderous regime.

The question no one asks about our politicians' "generosity" towards the world's needy is: By what right? By what right do they take our hard-earned money and give it away?

The reason politicians can get away with doling out money that they have no right to and that does not belong to them is that they have the morality of altruism on their side. According to altruism--the morality that most Americans accept and that politicians exploit for all it's worth--those who have more have the moral obligation to help those who have less. This is why Americans--the wealthiest people on earth--are expected to sacrifice (voluntarily or by force) the wealth they have earned to provide for the needs of those who did not earn it. It is Americans' acceptance of altruism that renders them morally impotent to protest against the confiscation and distribution of their wealth. It is past time to question--and to reject--such a vicious morality that demands that we sacrifice our values instead of holding on to them.

Next time a politician gives away money taken from you to show what a good, compassionate altruist he is, ask yourself: By what right?

David Holcberg is a research associate at the Ayn Rand Institute in Irvine, Calif.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: charity; tsunami
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 401-403 next last
To: MrLee

I do not think that the writers of the Constitution were dumb - far from it. Good for you donating to causes and charities you fell are worthwhile. I hope everyone does the same. But, to suggest that the Constitution does not permit this sort of aid is absurd.


101 posted on 12/30/2004 2:21:06 PM PST by The Noodle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas; Admin Moderator
Objectivist, selfish philosophy does not belong on FR.

Get rid of this sick post.

Agree.

102 posted on 12/30/2004 2:21:53 PM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: alnick

"I promise that if a poll were taken, the vast majority of taxpayers would agree to have some of their tax dollars go to help the tsunami victims."

The problem ethically with that is that it is not, nor would it ever be 100%... Since the vast majority of Americans want their money to go to help the tsunami victims (I'm sure that's true) why do we need the government to use FORCE to collect the cash?

Let individuals decide what they should do with the resources God gave them, we will indeed come through (as we're coming through now...)--besides there's no personal virtue in our tax money (read forced expropriations)being used for charitable purposes.

This is the epidome of the liberal LACK of care..."let the government do it!" which I think you find the areas of the country with the most liberal populations are the LEAST giving to charities... Folks with attitude's like Al Gore, who in 1999 with a $400,000+ income gave away $200.

"There is no virtue in compulsory government charity, and there is no virtue in advocating it. A politician who portrays himself as "caring" and "sensitive" because he wants to expand the government's charitable programs is merely saying that he's willing to try to do good with other people's money. Well, who isn't? And a voter who takes pride in supporting such programs is telling us that he'll do good with his own money -- if a gun is held to his head."

-- P.J. O'Rourke


"I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents."

- James Madison criticizing an attempt to grant public monies for charitable means, 1794


103 posted on 12/30/2004 2:21:59 PM PST by AnalogReigns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Windsong
"When you failed to do it for the least of these here brethren of mine..you failed to do it for me"

--J.C.

True, but as an individual endeavor.

The government shouldn't stick it's hand in MY pocket to make the decision FOR me.

104 posted on 12/30/2004 2:22:20 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
Don't you people know that America is the free insurance company for the whole world?

Insurance keeps too many people from saving money for the problems they cause.
Insurance stops personal responsibility.
105 posted on 12/30/2004 2:22:31 PM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ("sak")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Noodle

If you can show me where it does, I'll concede I was wrong.


106 posted on 12/30/2004 2:22:32 PM PST by MrLee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

Comment #107 Removed by Moderator

To: commonguymd
There is no history of Tsunami's in this area of the Indian Ocean. This has been discussed and discussed and discussed in other threads.

Information about tsunamis in the Indian Ocean can be found here. They are rare, compared to the Pacific Ocean, but not unheard of. Thailand and Indonesia were lax in their, IMO, since they border both the Indian and Pacific Ocean.

http://iri.columbia.edu/~lareef/tsunami/

108 posted on 12/30/2004 2:26:32 PM PST by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: The Noodle

"So let's see, the government of the most prosperous nation on the planet ........"

In case you havn't noticed, we (the gooberment) are currently in debt past our collective eyeballs.


109 posted on 12/30/2004 2:26:39 PM PST by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: frizzo426
Randroidism sort of fizzled out 10 years ago. Now it's a just a phase that immature and selfish adolescents hopefully transcend

So, I'm still an adolescent at 52? You flatter me sir! LOL!


110 posted on 12/30/2004 2:27:59 PM PST by Da Bilge Troll (The Compassionate Troll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #111 Removed by Moderator

To: rwfromkansas

Did you purchase this forum?


112 posted on 12/30/2004 2:29:33 PM PST by SoDak (home of Senator John Thune)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Da Bilge Troll
So, I'm still an adolescent at 52? You flatter me sir! LOL!

TWENTY years ago they were saying "Randroidism" fizzled out 10 years ago!

113 posted on 12/30/2004 2:31:41 PM PST by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

Agreed. How could someone write this when 120,000+ have died and millions are suffereing.


114 posted on 12/30/2004 2:34:17 PM PST by hasegawasama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

The sentiment is right on the mark. It is the difference between charity, and "coercive" philanthropy. Don't understand the difference? Read "A Christmas Carol".


115 posted on 12/30/2004 2:35:11 PM PST by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheDon

Agreed.


116 posted on 12/30/2004 2:36:42 PM PST by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

Comment #117 Removed by Moderator

Comment #118 Removed by Moderator

To: Grey Ghost II

I agree totally. While this earthquake and the following is a horrible tragedy, and I realize that help is definitely needed, I still bristle at the fact that my tax money is going for yet more aid that will be taken and then the US will be trashed. It is already happening and what does the government do - up the ante. Damn!


119 posted on 12/30/2004 2:39:57 PM PST by ImpotentRage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

I have already donated money to the victims via the Catholic Relief Fund


120 posted on 12/30/2004 2:40:09 PM PST by todd1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 401-403 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson