Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: zot

Ping.


45 posted on 01/03/2005 8:21:02 AM PST by Interesting Times (ABCNNBCBS -- yesterday's news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Interesting Times

This new theory makes sense. It seems obvious that the Wisconsin Glaciation receded from south to north, so it is logical that animals and men re-populated the area from south to north.

Another problem with the old theory -- the Bering Straits land-bridge may have been dry at the height of the glaciation, but if they crossed it, how could animals or men go by land along the coast south of what is now Alaska? There must have been deep glaciation inland and glaciers from the mountains right into the sea.


46 posted on 01/03/2005 12:37:27 PM PST by zot (GWB -- four more years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson