Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brian Allen

You can be sure that the banking industry will be opposed to halting illegal immigration. Several, Wa. Mutual, Wells Fargo, Bankof America and more contribute to MALDEF.

*****
Lou Dobbs Show/CNN/Aired 12/28/04
And Visa targets immigrant workers in a new ad campaign. But some say the program pose poses a security risk to this country.

PILGRIM: Visa International is launching an aggressive campaign to convince Latin American migrant workers to use plastic to send money back home. Now, Visa hopes to take over some of the money transfer business from companies like Western Union and Moneygram. Critics say using debit cards to transfer money raises new security concerns. Lisa Sylvester has the story.


LISA SYLVESTER, CNN CORRESPONDENT : Visa, it's everywhere you want to be, and in some places, you may not expect it to be. Visa International is targeting migrant and other workers from Latin America as its new favorite customer. The company is marketing its smart card that works as a prepaid debit card. Workers in the United States can easily transfer money to relatives abroad at a low cost. The banking industry hopes to tap into the remittance payment market that has been growing at an astronomical pace.

MANUEL OROZCO, INTER-AMERICAN DIALOGUE: In 2001, it is total volume of remittances to Latin American was $18 billion, and it grew to $38 billion three years later.

SYLVESTER: Wire services, including Western Union and Moneygram so far have dominated the $38 billion money-transfer market. A recent study found that 86 percent of remittances to Latin America and the Caribbean were cash transfers, 4 percent home delivery, 4 percent bank or credit union deposit, and 1 percent debit or smart card. Not everyone agrees that banking institutions make it easier to send money out of the country. Critics say nearly $40 billion a year exiting the United States is not small change, and leaves less money for some of the poorest U.S. communities. And there's also a potential security risk.

MARK KRIKORIAN, CENTER FOR IMMIGRATION STUDIES: Immigrant remittances are one of the ways bad guys can transfer money across borders because even though most of that money is completely innocent, people working jobs and sending money home, it can serve as cover for terrorists, other kinds of criminals to move money.

SYLVESTER: But Visa and other credit card companies are charging forward, reaching into one of the few untapped markets.


SYLVESTER: The banking industry is convinced it can capture more of the market because its costs tend to be lower than traditional wire transfers. The bank costs as little as $8 a transfer, using the smart cards, and on the other hand, wire services can cost up to $25 a transfer. Kitty?

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0412/28/ldt.01.html


15 posted on 01/02/2005 4:01:46 PM PST by JustAnotherSavage ("As frightening as terrorism is, it's the weapon of losers." P.J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: JustAnotherSavage
I'm starting to see a pattern here.

We have assembled over the years a Rube Goldberg contraption 'system' of big government, big tax codes, big legal and trial lawyer system, and big regulatory agencies.

All of these act as impediments for the average Joe, and his average size business. As conservatives, most of us hate this 'system'. But not all people do.

The status quo 'system' is not so bad for the Teresa Heinz Kerry crowd, who pay much less proportionally in income tax than you or I, on assets of close to a billion dollars. Her portfolio probably includes all of the companies you mention. Another large income investor includes the trial lawyers who have become extremely rich gaming the 'system'. Not all of the billions in tobacco settlement money goes into BMWs and large homes, much of it is invested in the companies on your list. After all, trial lawyers also want a good return on their money, as do we all.

Does the average middle income person pay more in income and social security tax than they make in earnings on their portfolios?

My point is that very wealthy investors in the companies you list stand to reap profits and earnings off of illegal immigration. They will profit far more than they lose by illegal immigration, as the long term social costs of this policy will not be borne proportionally by them, due to their much lower tax rates, and the fact that they do not avail themselves of the public school system.
21 posted on 01/02/2005 4:42:56 PM PST by Dat Mon (will work for clever tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson