Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Married, without children: Finding fulfillment with no kids
Rocky Mountain News ^ | 1/3/05 | Mark Wolf

Posted on 01/03/2005 8:31:56 AM PST by qam1

Nita and Ken Eaton hit the stores last month, as they do every Christmas, to find just the right gifts for the youngsters on their shopping list.

The carefully chosen presents weren't for their youngsters but for their nieces and nephews.

The Eatons are part of a small but growing segment of American couples who have chosen not to have children.

"We spend a lot of time thinking about what we're going to get our nieces and nephews for Christmas. We want to get them something meaningful," said Nita Eaton, 38.

The Eatons, married for five years, never had the desire to become parents.

"People used to always say: 'Your clock is ticking. You'll change your mind. It's different when they're your own,' " Nita said. "When I worked in a law firm, we were all in the age group to have kids, and I'd go to baby shower after baby shower, and I'd have to say honestly that it never hit me."

Many childless couples say they find themselves drifting away from friends once children are added to the mix.

"We started feeling sort of socially isolated," said Andrea Wenker, 33, of Colorado Springs. "Our friends started having babies and their lives changed. It revolves around the kids, and for good reason. The kind of things you used to do with your friends aren't an option anytime.

"They're talking about childbirth and diapers. It's important to their lives, but you start feeling, 'I'm still here, I'm still a person.' You start to feel kind of invisible."

She and Peter, her husband of 13 years, are childless by choice, and she is the coordinator of Denver Metro NO KIDDING!, one of 101 chapters of an international social group of more than 10,000 couples and singles without children. The Colorado group has about 200 members, 10 to 20 of whom typically attend the monthly get-togethers.

Jerry Steinberg, of Vancouver, British Columbia, calls himself the founding non-father of NO KIDDING! He started the group in 1983, he said via e-mail, because he was losing friends as they started to have children.

"They were no longer available for phone conversations, getting together for coffee or lunch, going to see movies, or much else," he said.

"Most people who have children seem to understand why I felt the need for a social club for child-free people, since people usually like to socialize with others who share at least some of their interests and have a similar lifestyle. After all, most, if not all, of (parents') friends were made through their kids' activities - the soccer moms get together, the softball dads meet, the school parents become friends, etc."

The number of childless-by-choice couples can't easily be determined, but anecdotal evidence indicates that their ranks are growing.

The Census Bureau doesn't ask whether couples are childless by choice, but the bureau projects that the percentage of families with children under 18 will decline from 47.7 percent in 1995 to 41.3 percent by 2010.

According to the National Center for Health Statistics, 6.6 percent of American women said they were voluntarily childless in 1995, the last time researchers asked the question. The number was up from 4.9 percent in 1982 and 6.2 percent in 1988.

The State of Our Unions, a 2003 report by the National Marriage Project at Rutgers University, reported Census Bureau projections that families with children will make up only 28 percent of U.S. households by 2010, the lowest number in at least a century.

"The underlying reason that there are fewer children is basically that women have other things to do," said David Popenoe, sociology professor at Rutgers and co-director of the National Marriage Project.

"Child-rearing in modern times is expensive and can be onerous, especially after you've been living as a single person or a couple without children for a while."

The decision to choose children, however, ultimately is very rewarding, he said.

"Over the long term, it's people who have children who are the happiest," said Popenoe.

Childless couples are used to hearing that their choice is either selfish or motivated by a dislike of children.

"I think it's being honest about what your priorities are and how you use them," said Wenker. "It doesn't mean everything's about you all the time. People don't decide to be parents because they're being philanthropic; it's because they want kids."

Nita Eaton works with children as a school psychologist.

"I like kids a lot and work with them in school," she said. "I see kids out there who don't have parents. That really played into my decision. If I decided to have kids, I'd go adopt one."

Population issues drive some decisions about whether to bear children.

"Whether or not I want to have kids is not the only consideration," said Wenker. "I believe there's a problem with population, serious issues with the environment, and I believe I have to be part of the solution."

Would-be parents should carefully consider their choice, said Ken Eaton, 42.

"It's a big decision that needs to be well-thought-out. There are a lot of unwanted kids out there. People didn't take the time to think about whether they would take the time to raise them."

Couples without children say they have more time to spend with their spouses and for volunteering.

The Eatons have three greyhounds and are board members of Rocky Mountain Greyhound Adoption, which they doubt they could do if they had children.

"They take a lot of time, energy and motivation. One has various autoimmune issues, one had a leg amputated, the other had a viral infection and has pretty bad arthritis," said Ken Eaton.

Having siblings who have children, say childless couples, tends to turn down the heat on family expectations to produce grandchildren.

Nita Eaton has three brothers with children, and all three of Ken's siblings have children.

"If I were an only child, I think, the pressure would be pretty great," Nita said. "I've always been pretty outspoken. My mom's pretty much backed off."

In a culture where parenthood is the norm, those who choose to bypass the baby boom often have their decisions questioned.

"Nobody's deliberately nasty," said Wenker. "From men, I get an odd reaction. The reaction (Peter) gets is, they get this look in their eyes that he's lucky. They like to get me to admit it's possible I'll change my mind. What I have to say to that is 'It doesn't seem likely' and 'It's just not an option.'

"I like my life. My husband and I have a very close relationship. We value the time between the two of us and can't imagine that interrupted. I've never regretted it."

Nita Eaton said she felt like an outsider when they moved into a neighborhood filled with young children.

"The woman who sold us our house said the neighbors had been asking how many kids we have," she said.

There is no cultural celebratory template for women who decide not to have children.

"I've thrown baby showers for girlfriends, and it's kind of this rite of passage," said Wenker. "We're going to buy you presents to get you started and treat you like Queen for a Day. It doesn't occur to anybody to celebrate a child-free woman in that way."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: abortion; breedyoumustbreed; childfree; childlessbychoice; childlessmarriage; culturewar; darwinaward; darwinnominee; deathofthewest; genx; ifeellonely; ifeelunloved; isthatallthereis; lookatme; myownprivatearmy; noscreamingkids; rccdoesntruntheusa; selfishadults; selfishnessatroot; swingers; whatsthepoint
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440 ... 681-693 next last
To: superiorslots
Aren't you the salfish one.. wanting to make sure somone takes care of you in old age.

How so?

401 posted on 01/03/2005 11:34:20 AM PST by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: Modernman
Other than paying for the welfare state, there is absolutely no reason that we need anything more than replacement rate fertility in this country.

Replacement rate is a nice theory, but it doesn't work in practice. How many "free will" replacement rate societies exist around the world? Societies are either expansive and limited by their environment/conditions/emigration or they are collapsing and supported by immigration.

402 posted on 01/03/2005 11:38:06 AM PST by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

To: econ_grad
Some people should not have children. My parents definitely shouldn't have, although I am glad to be alive.

Neither should my husband's parents. I thank God for him, but his mother especially was never prepared for what it took to have kids. She was already a bad mother while he was still in the womb.

403 posted on 01/03/2005 11:38:15 AM PST by conservative cat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: winodog

What a beautiful post. I'll remember it.

And you're right: you don't know love until you have a child.


404 posted on 01/03/2005 11:38:38 AM PST by olivia3boys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: A Ruckus of Dogs
An infinitely increasing population is a recipe for disaster. There are very real limits to water tables, arable land, and so forth. Exponential systems always crash.

Population isn't really exponential excepted in limited conditions, such as the remarkable medical advances of the past 100 years. When the average lifespan was 45 and the possible lifespan was, say 100, then an exponential jump was possible. With the possible lifespan pretty well reached, population isn't growing quite so fast.

Nor is there any real shortage of arable land. I live next to one of the largest cities in the world and arable land is being gobbled up for development simply because it is nearly worthless as arable land. By the population gloom and doomers' own numbers, we could support at least ten times the planetary population we have.

405 posted on 01/03/2005 11:45:50 AM PST by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies]

To: bigeasy_70118

It bothers you to get a Christmas card with someone's kid on it? Seriously? I have 3 kids and sometimes send out pics, sometimes not (and usually depending on the audience) but it would never offend me if someone sent me a card with their dog or boat or even their favorite potted plant on it. I did work with someone once who gave her coworkers pictures of her kid to put on their desks. That to me was irritating.


406 posted on 01/03/2005 11:46:00 AM PST by conservative cat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
but your example is of a couple who are not of the same mind, not those couples who mutually agree.

8-) That would just make the marriage doubly anullable. Usually one party is bringing the annulment. I've never heard of two people petitioning at the same time.

407 posted on 01/03/2005 11:48:59 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies]

To: qam1
There is no cultural celebratory template for women who decide not to have children.

"I've thrown baby showers for girlfriends, and it's kind of this rite of passage," said Wenker. "We're going to buy you presents to get you started and treat you like Queen for a Day. It doesn't occur to anybody to celebrate a child-free woman in that way."

Geez!
Look, Wanker, er... Wenker
The Moon orbits the Earth, which in turn revolves around the Sun.
The Sun and the planets are part of a Solar System that revolves around the center of the Milky Way galaxy.
The Milky Way is part of a cluster of galaxies called the "Local Group" that revolve around a central point in the universe.
That central point is not you.
Get over it.

408 posted on 01/03/2005 11:49:36 AM PST by Ignatz (Strategic Air Command: Peace is our profession...........bombing's just a hobby!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hopespringseternal
By the population gloom and doomers' own numbers, we could support at least ten times the planetary population we have.

There are various organizations, as well as studies done by our own government which say fishing stocks have markedly declined because of population growth. More people means more pollution - live in any large city to witness this. And I don't want to live on a planet that is wall to wall people.

409 posted on 01/03/2005 11:50:33 AM PST by A Ruckus of Dogs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy

My husband and I are 40 and 42, DINKS, and proudly conservative!

We both have nieces and nephews and realize that we don't want kids.

What irritates me the most about friends who have kids is that they think it is OK to bring their SPOILED child along on the rare event that we get together for dinner at a nice restaurant. The evening is always spent cleaning up the overturned drink, constantly shushing the child who insists on yelling to his mom every time she tries to hold a conversation, taking him to the bathroom 3 or 4 times during dinner, pulling him off the top of the table or out from underneath the table and chasing him around the restaurant whenever he escapes and takes off running. And we KNOW if we suggest they get a sitter, it will sound offensive to them.


410 posted on 01/03/2005 11:51:30 AM PST by Muzzle_em
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: RebelBanker

The instruction manual is given to you by your parents over the course of your childhood. Unfortunately, many of them are filled with misprints, typos and random pages from other books. And today, there only seem to be abridged versions available. Apparently the people who produce television shows and video games have been given responsibility for raising children. So you have to see them about obtaining a copy.


411 posted on 01/03/2005 11:54:02 AM PST by durasell (Friends are so alarming, My lover's never charming...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 371 | View Replies]

To: Modernman
A statistically insignificant percentage of people choosing not to have children really makes no difference to society at large.

Really? What about couples who decide to have only one child, or two? These people are of the same mindset, and their numbers are not statistically insignificant. We are now below replacement level, excluding immigrants.

412 posted on 01/03/2005 11:54:43 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies]

To: superiorslots

Hello Superiorslots/

My husband and I do not have any children, also by choice. We prayed about it a great deal before marrying, and decided (together) that being parents was just NOT God's call on our lives, nor did either of us want to have children. I do not believe that we are selfish or self-centered, and strive to be a blessing to others (and to be a great aunt and uncle to our 1 niece and 2 nephews). We also did not do it to save the environment (but, hey, we DO recycle!) We are staunch conservatives, evangelical christians, vote Republican, oppose abortion, and seek to help those less fortunate. My husband is active duty military, in his 22nd year of service to our nation.

We are not selfish, self-centered, or wackos becuase we have chosen not to have children. (And we did not make the decision for reasons based on career or money).

I agree with you that those who chastise or castigate us are just..... wrong.

God bless you and your wife.


413 posted on 01/03/2005 11:56:03 AM PST by PERKY2004 ((Perky, positive and smart .... them pesky liberals do NOT know what to do with me!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies]

To: hopespringseternal
Societies are either expansive and limited by their environment/conditions/emigration or they are collapsing and supported by immigration.

Other than paying for welfare programs, what reason is there to grow the American population? Certainly, we should be aiming for at least replacement levels. If our native birth rate is lower than replacement level, we can make up the difference with sensible immigration policies.

However, I see no reason to grow the American population to, say, 500 million.

414 posted on 01/03/2005 11:56:38 AM PST by Modernman (What is moral is what you feel good after. - Ernest Hemingway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 402 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
"BTW, you ignored the much more serious part of my post, and focused on the part you could slam me about. Don't think I didn't notice."

I have never understood people who care more about animals than they do other people. I never will, but I wished you well anyway. What more do you want?

415 posted on 01/03/2005 11:56:48 AM PST by Artist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies]

To: exnavychick

This weekend, some friends and I went target shooting. Two guys brought their sons. One boy was an absolute pleasure-fun, responsible, good humored and tough. The other boy, who was younger, was a whiney brat who got in the way and ended up crying and annoying everyone else.

I don't have kids yet and my wife and I want a few, but sometimes, when I have to hang around brats, I strongly consider surgery.

In the brat's defense, though, his dad is a wus too and shouldn't have come with us either.


416 posted on 01/03/2005 11:57:02 AM PST by Rocky Mountain High
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
8-) That would just make the marriage doubly anullable. Usually one party is bringing the annulment. I've never heard of two people petitioning at the same time.

But those of the same mind are not in disagreement. Annulment grounds only speaks to those seeking out, not to whether it is intrinsically wrong for couples to happily not desire children. I think there are other rules that apply to Catholics on that, but I am far from the one to find it and quote it, I am not Catholic :~D

417 posted on 01/03/2005 12:00:06 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 407 | View Replies]

To: Modernman
Who the hell cares about college in comparison to bringing another life into the world?

Responsible people who care about their childrens' future. We have way too many people in this world who get knocked up without thinking about what kind of life they can provide their child.

Better not to exist than not to be schooled?

If I had a choice between being born and being deprived of my piece of paper, I'd tell you which one I'd pick.

418 posted on 01/03/2005 12:01:11 PM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies]

To: qam1
One of my favorite Dear Abby columns...just in case nobody has posted this yet. BTW, before anybody ruptures themselves jumping to conclusions, I am a forty-four-year old, married, professional woman that has NEVER been pregnant thanks to the miracle of modern conception prevention.


Ann Landers' famous "The Childless Couple"

There is nothing sadder than a childless couple. It breaks my heart to see them relaxing around swimming pools in Florida, sitting all suntanned and miserable on the decks of their boats -- trotting off to Europe like lonesome fools. It's an empty life. Nothing but money to spend, more time to enjoy and a whole lot less to worry about.

The poor childless couple are so wrapped up in themselves, you have to feel sorry for them. They don't fight over the child's discipline, don't blame each other for the child's most obnoxious characteristics, and they miss all the fun of doing without for the child's sake. They just go along, doing whatever they want, buying what they want and liking each other. It's a pretty pathetic picture.

Everyone should have children. No one should be allowed to escape the wonderful experience that accompanies each stage in the development of the young -- the happy memories of sleepless nights, coughing spells, tantrums, diaper rash, debts, "dipso" baby sitters, saturated mattresses, emergencies and never-ending crises.

How dismal is the peaceful home without the constant childish problems that make a well-rounded life and an early breakdown; the tender, thoughtful discussions when the report card reveals the progeny to be one step below a moron; the end-of-the-day reunions with all the joyful happenings recited like well-placed blows to the temples.

Children are worth it. Every moment of anxiety, every sacrifice, every complete collapse pays off as a fine, sturdy adolescent is reached. The feeling of reward the first time you took the boy hunting -- he didn't mean to shoot you, the lad was excited. Remember how he cried? How sorry he was? And how much better you felt after the blood transfusion? These are the times a man with a growing son treasures -- memories that are captured forever in the heart and the limp.

Think back to the night of romantic adventure when your budding daughter eloped with the village idiot. What childless couple ever shared in the stark realism of that drama? Aren't you a better man for having lived richly, fully, acquiring that tic in your left eye? Could a woman without children touch the strength and heroism of your wife as she tried to fling herself out of the bedroom window?

The childless couple live in a vacuum. They fill their lonely days with golf, vacation trips, dinner dates, civic affairs, tranquility, leisure and entertainment. There is a terrifying emptiness without children, but the childless couple are too comfortable to know it.

You just have to look at them to see what the years have done: He looks boyish, unlined and rested; she's slim, well-groomed and youthful. It isn't natural. If they had had kids, they'd look like the rest of us -- worn out, wrinkled and exhausted.


419 posted on 01/03/2005 12:02:57 PM PST by WolfRunnerWoman (I want closure on the word "closure".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Artist
I have never understood people who care more about animals than they do other people. I never will, but I wished you well anyway. What more do you want?

What do I want? For people making judgments about me or giving me advice to at least make a fair analysis of what is actually driving my decision, and it is much more complex than just some misguided affection for animals over people, which is not in anything I have said.

420 posted on 01/03/2005 12:03:42 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 415 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440 ... 681-693 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson