Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senator Jeff Sessions: Bush makes right move (on judges)
USA Today | January 3, 2005 | Senator Jeff Sessions (R-Al)

Posted on 01/03/2005 2:17:18 PM PST by RWR8189

Title and link only.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: democrats; fillibuster; jeffsessions; judges; judiciary; nuclear; senate; sessions

1 posted on 01/03/2005 2:17:20 PM PST by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

for the lazy or busy - the right move was to renominate 20 judicial candidates that were filibustered by the dims


2 posted on 01/03/2005 2:21:45 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead (I believe in American Exceptionalism! Do you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Ann Coulter on FNC now (CST)


3 posted on 01/03/2005 2:23:07 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead (I believe in American Exceptionalism! Do you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead

Actually, it's now in every time zone!


4 posted on 01/03/2005 2:24:04 PM PST by Buck W. (How can anyone who works for a living vote democrat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

I think the Reps are primed to do something bold to break the deadlock on judicial nominees. Commentaries like this are the early salvos.


5 posted on 01/03/2005 2:25:14 PM PST by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead

The Rule...!


6 posted on 01/03/2005 2:25:39 PM PST by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

The article states that Ken Salazar, Senator elect of CO, promised in his campaign not to filibuster judges.... One step closer to votes on the floor for those being held up, or so it seems.


7 posted on 01/03/2005 2:26:41 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Remarkable that USA Today agreed to publish this. Senator Sessions makes a persuasive arguement that should appeal to ordinary readers.


8 posted on 01/03/2005 2:29:36 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
I think the Reps are primed to do something bold to break the deadlock on judicial nominees. Commentaries like this are the early salvos.


9 posted on 01/03/2005 2:33:48 PM PST by pookie18 (Clinton Happens!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead
Rules you know you mentioned Ann and didn't post her pic.


10 posted on 01/03/2005 2:57:51 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pookie18

The republicans don't want a nuclear option, they want a constitutional option. Something the democrat don't want any part of.


11 posted on 01/03/2005 2:58:26 PM PST by chainsaw (("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - H. Clinton))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents

I have not made a statement either way to the decision to keep Spectre as Chairman. Both arguments were compelling, and was uncertain as to the best option. My only interest is ensuring judges are no longer subjected to a litmus test.

I am closely watching how the Reps handle the filibusters. This is a key issue for me, as it is for many conservatives. I'm anxiously anticipating what I hope is about to happen. The Reps break the filibusters, and I'll guarantee my support during the fallout in the MSM. I have a long memory, that can work to the good as well as the bad. Senators that sign on with us won't be forgotton.


12 posted on 01/03/2005 3:02:15 PM PST by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

thanks for picking up my slack there


13 posted on 01/03/2005 3:05:55 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead (I believe in American Exceptionalism! Do you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: chainsaw
The republicans don't want a nuclear option, they want a constitutional option.

You & I know that, but the cartoonist may have been using the popular term...possibly...

14 posted on 01/03/2005 3:13:32 PM PST by pookie18 (Clinton Happens!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Jeff Sessions - Presidential timber.

Bio: http://www3.capwiz.com/c-span/webreturn/?url=http://sessions.senate.gov


15 posted on 01/03/2005 3:14:57 PM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker

I hope I'm not simply deluded by wishful thinking, but Frist has sent out plenty of signals that the GOP senators have had it with the obstruction. I think they also realize that they can't be seen as weak against the tyrany of the minority, and continue to expect conservatives' votes.


16 posted on 01/03/2005 3:34:23 PM PST by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents

I don't believe you are deluded.

I'm cautiously optimistic. The basic numbers have altered in "conservative" favor in the Senate, at least where the Judiciary is concerned. I do understand they were handicapped before as a "majority minority".

The trouble is that faith is earned. What the Reps have been signaling sounds good but the track record, regardless of handicaps, has been discouraging. In front of the camera it "felt" as if they weren't willing to go to the mat to stop the filibusters. Behind the scenes it may have been different but since we aren't privy to their strategy sessions we can only take our cue from what we see.

If nothing else I'm still energized by the election. I don't think this session is going to mirror the last. Only time will tell, but I do sense a change. I do believe there is cause for hope but I'm withholding full faith until they've earned it.


17 posted on 01/03/2005 3:48:16 PM PST by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker

I think the GOP margin in the Senate was so slim that the likes of Lincoln Chaffee, Spector, Susan Collins, and perhaps Olympia Snowe, made it impossible for the Reps to "drop the bomb," so to speak, on the Dems' filibuster efforts. The muscle it would have taken to make a procedural decision that filibusters of judicial nominations are unconstitution stick simply didn't exist before this election. We'll see.


18 posted on 01/03/2005 3:54:22 PM PST by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson