- Actually, the title of the article is:
"More U.S. Births, A Bit Less Stress On Social Security"
That's not very honest to change the title of a link;
and it will be the last link from you, that I will click on because of it.
The subject of the article was about birth rates, not "Entitlement programs financed by hispanics for the benefit of whites."
What kind of a damn lie was that?
THAT article had absolutely NOTHING to do with illegal aliens aka "guest workers" who will be eligible to collect social security after only 18 months of paying into the system.
That Global Action On Aging" website is an extremely liberal/socialist site, with an office at the U.N.
Their mission statement HERE:
http://www.globalaging.org/about_gaa/mission.htm
"...Global Action on Aging carries out research on critical emerging topics and publishes the results. It distributes news both directly, through its own publications, and through the mass media. It maintains a presence at the United Nations Headquarters in New York and participates in major UN events and conferences...."
They also bash President Bush's privatization plan on social security. HERE:
http://www.globalaging.org/index.htm
"US: The Devil is in the Details of the Bush Social Security Privatization
This writer lays out the tactics that Bush and privatization advocates will use to persuade US citizens that Social Security “must” be changed. Don’t let the wool be pulled over your eyes!"
Are you a liberal/socialist? Tell me the truth; be honest with me, and don't give me any more links to socialist sites, and then dishonestly change the name of the article, OK?
Yes, my link symbol was different from the article title. Although it was a good article in many respects, I was actually trying to point you to a particular passage within the article, that dealt with that subject of hispanics, whites, and entitlements. Had you bothered to read the article, you would know that.
Yes, you are right about the council. But, once again, had you bothered to read the article, you would have noticed that the particular passage was being quoted from an article published by the Heritage Foundation. Not hardly a socialist group.