Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court justice shows up for jury duty in state court
AP ^ | 1/4/5 | GINA HOLLAND

Posted on 01/04/2005 5:32:12 PM PST by SmithL

WASHINGTON (AP) --

No one took any notice of the tall, slim man who appeared Tuesday for jury duty. Had he worn his black robe, Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer no doubt would have drawn more attention.

Even Marlborough, Mass., District Court Judge Thomas Sullivan Jr. didn't recognize Breyer until he read the justice's name on a document listing potential jurors for cases he was hearing.

"When I looked at the slip I said, 'Oh, my God,"' Sullivan said in a telephone interview with The Associated Press.

Two cases were to be heard, one for drunken driving and another for assault. Enough jurors were picked for the assault case before Breyer's name was called, and the defense attorney in the drunken driving case excluded the justice from that jury.

According to Sullivan, the defense attorney said, "The last thing I need is two judges on the case."

Breyer, 66, said he felt it was important to do his civic duty and report to the courthouse,

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: breyer

1 posted on 01/04/2005 5:32:13 PM PST by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL
According to Sullivan, the defense attorney said, "The last thing I need is two judges on the case."

Now I find that statement hilarious.

2 posted on 01/04/2005 5:38:16 PM PST by Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Green
Now I find that statement hilarious.

I find it telling.

3 posted on 01/04/2005 5:41:30 PM PST by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: konaice

very true but funny at the same time. Especially given the justice in question.


4 posted on 01/04/2005 5:43:01 PM PST by Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

"Breyer, 66, said he felt it was important to do his civic duty and report to the courthouse,"

He felt. I think he's required to by law.

The last time I was for jury duty (about 5 years ago) and after we had been randomly chosen, the judge let us go out for lunch and said: "From now on you belong to me." He had a great sense of humor.


5 posted on 01/04/2005 5:53:08 PM PST by TAquinas (Should I call it ZotBlog or BlogZot. Suggestions welcome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TAquinas
He felt. I think he's required to by law.

Technically, yes.

However, usually judges, bailifs, police, attorneys are summarily given an exemption, because the likelyhood of actually being selected for a jury is so thin as to be a waste of everybody's time.

I'm sure the Justice thought it amusing.

6 posted on 01/04/2005 6:00:45 PM PST by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: konaice

Thanks for the reminder.

Very true. I almost forgot.


7 posted on 01/04/2005 6:08:09 PM PST by TAquinas (Should I call it ZotBlog or BlogZot. Suggestions welcome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
"...'When I looked at the slip I said, Oh, my God,' Sullivan said...."

Nah, only Justice Breyer.

What's that about all men being created equal again?
8 posted on 01/04/2005 6:42:56 PM PST by Chummy (A happy and prosperous New Year from Chummy and Family!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: konaice

Lawyers aren't excused in this county.


9 posted on 01/04/2005 7:22:08 PM PST by Mercat (I know my Redeemer lives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
"Breyer, 66, said he felt it was important to do his civic duty and report to the courthouse, ..."

As an active working member of the law industry, he was merely reporting for work! It had nothing to do with civic duty!
10 posted on 01/04/2005 7:32:01 PM PST by leprechaun9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TAquinas
He felt. I think he's required to by law.

There might be exemptions for public officials. I suspect one side or the other would be sure to premptively challenge him anyway.

11 posted on 01/04/2005 7:33:23 PM PST by El Gato (Activist Judges can twist the Constitution into anything they want ... or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson