Posted on 01/04/2005 6:42:27 PM PST by quidnunc
I wouldn't normally dare to waste your precious time, dear reader, with light-hearted discussions of frivolous matters. But just this once I ask your permission for an excursion into a realm that, on the face of it, has little in common with politics, namely that of high art. My excuse is a valid one, however: the launch of the extended DVD edition of last year's Oscar winning film 'The Return of the King, based on JRR Tolkien's epic drama The Lord of the Rings.
The reason for choosing this subject is not an aesthetic one, however. I merely want to add my five cents worth to a recent discussion over at NRO's The Corner (Link). The subject was Tolkien's politics, or rather: the politics of The Lord of the Rings. Inspired by the newly released DVD the Corner dwellers decided to seek a definitive answer to that age-old question: who does Middle Earth really belong to? Mind you, not: who in Middle Earth Sauron or Saruman, or even orcs or men but: who of us here and now, in the real world. Basically, they wanted to decide once and for all whether LOTR is a liberal or a conservative novel.
According to the man who first raised the question, John Hillen, the answer was obvious: it's conservative, precious, conservative! He was so confident that he even offered a $100 award for any reader who could present him with a convincing argument why liberals might also want to read this most conservative of novels. Within hours, he received enough e-mails from Tolkien geeks to fill another thousand editions of The Corner.
-snip-
(Excerpt) Read more at techcentralstation.com ...
Tolkein was a hard-line conservative. I don't know why this question is even up for debate.
Absolutely - he was a devout Catholic who came of age in Edwardian times. He was no hipster, "modernist" follower of socialism, but a man who was fascinated by ancient notions of honor and valor. At the end of his life, he was bewildered by the way the hippie movement glommed on to his work the way they did.
That's a good website.
Isn't the more important question - "Was he gay?" /s
I know it's not dealing with the stories themselves, but in the readers reactions to them, but I tend to think the "art imitates life" theory applies in this case.
But keep in mind Gandalf and the hobbits were potheads. The traitorous Saruman even chastises Gandalf a bit over that.. ;)
Nowhere in the books can you find an analogue for Gandalf and the hobbits being potheads.
I think you need to put that bong down yourself : )
If you ever spent time in a communist country, you'd see communist have little concern for the enviroment once they have control. They just use it as an emotional stepping stone on they're rise to power.
ring ping
Potheads?
I thought they were catching heck for being evil tobacco smoker!
Quite simply, LOTR is conservative.
Good is good. Evil is evil.
Right is right. Wrong is wrong.
And the truth is important.
No way you can spin that into lie'bralism.
Exaclty. It is the comfortable world of black and white, good and evil.
This does not exist in the liberal mindset.
Tolkein said that LotR doesn't include political or social commentary. Gandalf is not Jesus, Sauron is not Satan, it's not pro-liberal pro-conservative. It's just a good story. Sit back and read (or watch.)
Don't forget the obvious homosexual acts by the Hobbits. I was almost convinced that I was going to see some gay Hobbit porn somewhere in that trilogy.
Oh, please. They're complete stoners! Just look at 'em. Their purpose in life is to drink ale, eat six meals a day (helloo!), and laze about in the meadows smoking their weed. They don't want any 'adventure' and they're dazzled by sparkly lights. They seem to be into cuddling too. Lots and lots of cuddling. LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.