Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Fails to Make List of World's Freest Economies
NewsMax ^ | January 4,2005 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 01/05/2005 9:25:11 AM PST by LongsforReagan

U.S. Fails to Make List of World's Freest Economies

The United States is missing for the first time from an annual ranking of the world's 10 freest economies.

Story Continues Below

The Index of Economic Freedom, published by The Heritage Foundation and The Wall Street Journal since 1995, finds that the United States is letting Big Brother grow obese as other countries get lean and fit. Chile, Australia and Iceland improved enough to leave the U.S. in a tie with Switzerland for 12th place.

"The United States is resting on its laurels while innovative countries around the world are changing their approaches and reducing their roadblocks," said Marc Miles, a co-editor of the book, along with Ed Feulner and Mary Anastasia O'Grady. "The U.S. is eating the dust of countries that have thrown off the 20th-century shackles of big government spending and massive federal programs."

The index analyzes 50 economic variables in 10 categories. This year 86 countries showed improvement, 57 declined, and 12, including America, were unchanged.

Though out of the top 10, the U.S. still had scores good enough to be among the 17 "free" economies. Fifty-six nations were considered "mostly free," 70 "mostly unfree" and 12 "repressed."

The top 10: Hong Kong, Singapore, Luxembourg, Estonia (yes, the former Soviet "republic"), Ireland, New Zealand, U.K., Denmark, Iceland and Australia, followed by Chile.

Awwww: Saddam's Allies Fare Poorly

Among those that failed to make the list of the free: socialist Germany, 18th; Belgium, 21st; socialist Spain, 31st; Japan, 39th; and lowly France, 44th. Thanks to power-mad Vladimir Putin, Russia was only 124th, behind Rwanda.

The U.S. earned top scores in property rights, banking/finance and monetary policy. What hurt it: a miserable rating in fiscal burden of government, worse than all but 30 countries in the survey.

"This reflects poor scores in the area of taxation. The U.S. corporate tax rate ranks 112th out of the 155 countries scored, and its top individual tax rate ranks an only somewhat better 82nd. The fiscal burden rating also reflects the fact that federal spending that has reached levels not seen since World War II and that now costs the average household more than $20,000 per year," The Heritage Foundation announced.

Miles stated: "If we don't get federal spending under control, we'll continue to be passed by nations willing to take the steps necessary for dynamic financial growth. We all know it - now it's time for Congress to make it happen."

'Misery Has a Cure'

O'Grady wrote today in The Journal, in a column headlined "Hail Estonia!": "The lesson? Stand still on the highway to economic liberty and the world will soon start to pass you by. ...

"Policy makers who pay lip service to fighting poverty would do well to grasp the link between economic freedom and prosperity. This year the Index finds that the freest economies have a per-capita income of $29,219, more than twice that of the 'mostly free' at $12,839, and more than four times that of the 'mostly unfree.' Put simply, misery has a cure and its name is economic freedom."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: economy; fails; notconservative; sizeofgovernment; us
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
Whats the credibility of this study? And if its true, is it surprising? Soon all that will differentiate the parties is social issues and the military strategy. Fiscal conservatism appears..dead.
1 posted on 01/05/2005 9:25:12 AM PST by LongsforReagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LongsforReagan

Starting to foreward this to every member of congress and the President.


2 posted on 01/05/2005 9:29:26 AM PST by satchmodog9 (Murder and weather are our only news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LongsforReagan

Soon all that will differentiate the parties is social issues and the military strategy.


sounds like Pakistan


3 posted on 01/05/2005 9:31:00 AM PST by sure_fine (*not one to over kill the thought process*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LongsforReagan
"This reflects poor scores in the area of taxation."

Another way of saying we are not taxed enough.

Rating the UK as a more free economy? Heck, rating any EU country as more free in nonsense. . .with their socialistic governments and welfare states by any true measure they cannot be "free" and most certainly are not more free than the US.
4 posted on 01/05/2005 9:37:55 AM PST by Gunrunner2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LongsforReagan; Shermy

It would be interesting to know how they arrived at the list, and how they measured economic freedom. I notice several of the countries listed are known for their social safety nets and high tax rates, I would not have thought of them as leading the list of free economies.


5 posted on 01/05/2005 9:38:44 AM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LongsforReagan
"This reflects poor scores in the area of taxation. The U.S. corporate tax rate ranks 112th out of the 155 - Is #1 the country with the highest or lowest corp tax?
6 posted on 01/05/2005 9:38:58 AM PST by SF Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LongsforReagan
Whats the credibility of this study? And if its true, is it surprising?

I don't find it surprising. Businesses in the U.S. are severely over regulated. Regulation was one of the factors weighed in the study. The U.S. is slipping in economic freedom.

7 posted on 01/05/2005 9:39:56 AM PST by BJungNan (Did you call your congressmen to tell them to stop funding the ACLU? 202 224 3121)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gunrunner2
Heck, rating any EU country as more free in nonsense. . .with their socialistic governments and welfare states by any true measure they cannot be "free" and most certainly are not more free than the US.

Perhaps you need to re-visit your premise, and entertain the possibility that some EU nations are less "socialistic" than the U.S.

8 posted on 01/05/2005 9:42:16 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LongsforReagan

Part of the reason for "outsourcing" perhaps.


9 posted on 01/05/2005 9:43:12 AM PST by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SF Republican

I'll guess that #1 = lowest. My understanding is that the U.S. corporate tax rate is comparitively one of the highest.


10 posted on 01/05/2005 9:43:18 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

No.


11 posted on 01/05/2005 9:44:08 AM PST by Gunrunner2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Gunrunner2

Well, I gotta' tell 'ya . . . it's never been a secret that Estonia is a free-market heaven, and a good number of the new EU entrants have a flat (and low) income tax. Compared to us, well . . . enough said.


12 posted on 01/05/2005 9:46:14 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LongsforReagan
...misery has a cure and its name is economic freedom.

Just try to tell that to the lawyers, bureaucrats, and politicians dependent on economic unfreedom!

13 posted on 01/05/2005 9:49:04 AM PST by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LongsforReagan

A free economic system that encourages entrepreneurial activities and allows "creative destruction" of outmoded industries is extremely complex. I don't know how you would measure it.

I also don't see how England can be near the top when it is subject to EU regulation. In England, for instance, farmers are required by EU fiat to provide toys for their pigs to play with, so they won't chew off their tails. Farm stands that sell vegetables by the pound instead of the kilo are subject to criminal prosecution. Pub owners are not supposed to sell beer by the pint. And so forth. I very much doubt whether even post-Thatcher England is as free as the U.S.


14 posted on 01/05/2005 9:51:46 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gunrunner2

No. This article is saying we are taxed way too much. When you combine personal taxes with corporate taxes (which people really pay), the U.S. nearly taxes more per capita than any country on the planet.


15 posted on 01/05/2005 9:54:31 AM PST by Codeflier (Implement Loser Pays)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LongsforReagan

And if it's credible and true, what are the economic results? Restrictions don't always work against us.


16 posted on 01/05/2005 10:04:22 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Pub owners are not supposed to sell beer by the pint.

By law they must - The Weights and Measures Act 1985 (Metrication) (Amendment) Order 1994
17 posted on 01/05/2005 10:05:47 AM PST by toadthesecond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Let's compare that to what I know about regarding my landscaping biz in the US.Before I could even have "landscaping" on my business license,I had to pass a state certification test.I couldn't plant one seed without taking the test and passing.Most states require this.Also,I cannot apply any pesticide,such as 24D,MSMA,or RoundUp without passing a state certification test for pesticides. I can't draw up a landscaping plan,even in crayon,without passing yet another test,certifying me as a "landscape designer".

Also,for each and every pesticide I apply,I must keep records of where I applied,how much,what method was used,and what I applied for 3 years.I also must be insured for being a landscape contractor(no biggie,I would anyway,but it's the principal).When I renew my license,they have to know exactly how much I made last year,to the penny.They need copies of my insurance and state certifications.All of this,if not followed,will bring fines and jail time,plus the loss of ones business license.

We're not nearly as free as we think we are.

18 posted on 01/05/2005 10:06:57 AM PST by quack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LongsforReagan
Related threads:
Bush's budget gyrations
US drops out of world's 10 freest economies list, says WSJ

In relentless pursuit of a global corporate plutocracy, the Bush Administration has left intact an economically oppressive federal regulatory bureacracy while undermining American Middle Class business interests with importation of foreign goods and labor.

19 posted on 01/05/2005 10:17:34 AM PST by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Burdensome labor laws, antiquated and restrictive acquisition laws, welfare nanny-states. . .yup. . .'nuff said.
20 posted on 01/05/2005 10:18:02 AM PST by Gunrunner2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson