This idiot must be a glutton for punishment. He still believes the verdict regarding the Rather memos is "inconclusive"!! The idiot has no shame! And this guy works as an editor for the prestigious CJR....???
To: Cyropaedia
Again, I am not saying the memos were produced in 1973. Im saying we dont know, and that the fact that the Killian documents dont resemble some other documents from the period seems a week reed to prove anythingAll they have to do is seem like they do or suggest that they do, right? Or, "we don't know", that's good enough, right? I guess that's good enough for CBS.
To: Cyropaedia
His entire premise is ass backwards.
It was never up to the bloggers or anybody else to prove that the CBS memo was a forgery.
It was up to CBS to prove that it was legitimate, which they couldn't do, for obvious reasons.
Well, obvious to everybody but an idiot, like Corey Pein.
3 posted on
01/05/2005 11:16:01 AM PST by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: Cyropaedia
Only after weeks of research and reporting did I reach my conclusion not that the memos are real, but that there is no definitive evidence in the blogs or in the press that supports the conventional wisdom that they are forged. We simply dont know from the incomplete evidence thats before usSo after weeks of "objective" detective work this dolt couldn't come to a conclusion. The mere fact that CBS ran with the story without any detective work is part of the evidence they were fraudulent. Doesn't that count for something?
To: Cyropaedia
his old Guard friends -- trafficked in equally dubious assertions about Kerry, and that wasnt reported.What were they? Were they the same things the Swift Boat Vets were saying that the Kerry campaign had to back track on?
To: Cyropaedia
Why didn't CBS interview Buck Staudt's wife or son about the memos?
To: Cyropaedia
Corey, those memos are completely phony. Period. If they were merely Microsoft Word reconstructions of Texas Air National Guard documents from the Sixties and Seventies, Burkett could have answered the forgery allegations by producing the actual documents. Actually, if he'd had genuine documents, he could have released those and completely avoided the accusations. He didn't do that, because he didn't have them, I would respectfully suggest because they never existed. As it is, you have to believe one of two things: Either the Burkett docs were forgeries, or somebody teleported a computer and printer back to that Guard base.
9 posted on
01/05/2005 11:23:26 AM PST by
RichInOC
(Dan Rather: Who SAYS Ted Baxter Was A Fictional Character?)
To: Cyropaedia
http://www.powerlineblog.com/
scroll down to:
Journalism In Decline
Corey Pein of the Columbia Journalism Review sent us an email yesterday, with a link to his article in that magazine on the fake 60 Minutes documents. "You may be interested in this," he wrote. We were interested, all right, but we're sorry to report that the article is astonishingly bad.
11 posted on
01/05/2005 11:24:25 AM PST by
MEG33
(GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
To: Cyropaedia
Whatever they decide about the documents, I am confident in my piece.More like, he is confident in his ignorance.
To: Cyropaedia
Has anyone yet provided a duplicate using machines of the time? No? Yet someone can easily provide a duplicate using machines of this time, using software that was readily available at the Kinkos it was faxed from.
Gee, what a difficult challenge this is. Oh, and we view all liberals who equate Bush to Hitler as being wacko, not just Burkett.
13 posted on
01/05/2005 11:26:35 AM PST by
kingu
(Which would you bet on? Iraq and Afghanistan? Or Haiti and Kosovo?)
To: Cyropaedia
Dimwit says you can't prove to him the earth is round.
14 posted on
01/05/2005 11:27:13 AM PST by
Wheee The People
(Oo ee oo ah ah, ting tang, walla-walla bing bang. Oo ee oo ah ah, ting tang, walla-walla bing bang!)
To: Cyropaedia
" A correspondent writes that it is loony to compare Bush to Hitler as Burkett once did. Fair enough. But Burkett was tarred for saying something that other liberals do all the time, loony or not. And that was unfair. This doesn't mean I agree with Burkett or think he's devoid of blame in this affair. Some of the people who were defending Bush during Memogate -- his old Guard friends -- trafficked in equally dubious assertions about Kerry, and that wasnt reported." Bush's old Guard friends compared Kerry to Hitler? I must of missed that. All I heard them say was that Bush was a good pilot who did his duty. I don't recall them saying anything about John Kerry.
16 posted on
01/05/2005 11:38:06 AM PST by
Ditto
( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
To: Cyropaedia
Some of the people who were defending Bush during Memogate -- his old Guard friends -- trafficked in equally dubious assertions about Kerry, and that wasnt reported. Ahhhh ... Corey says it is so, so it must be so.
17 posted on
01/05/2005 11:40:07 AM PST by
dirtboy
(To make a pearl, you must first irritate an oyster)
To: Cyropaedia
...Mary Mapes put Bill Burkett in touch with Joe Lockhart. If thats enough to constitute "apparent coordination," then what of the previously unreported meeting between Bush and his old Guard buddies in March? Thats in my article, but I havent seen the speculators run wild with it yet, as they did with the "Kerry connection."
Great logic here. A CBS employee puts a source in touch with a person from the DNC (Lockhart) = President talking to friends. If it were Fox that arranged for the President and his buddies to meet this would be analogous, otherwise this is just plain silly.
18 posted on
01/05/2005 12:22:25 PM PST by
Sthitch
To: Cyropaedia
Corey Haim, Corey Feldman, Corey Pein . . . I can't keep all the has-been child stars straight.
21 posted on
01/05/2005 3:31:13 PM PST by
Xenalyte
(Your mother sells hot dogs.)
To: Cyropaedia; Howlin; Buckhead
Pein thinks well of Prof. Hailey the "technical writing" instructor, but Newcomer demolishes Hailey's amateurish claims here:
http://www.flounder.com/bush2b.htm
In fact, Hailey's document has been removed. I don't blame him, I read it before he took it down, and it was nothing but a smokescreen, focusing on font types instead of the overall document, and even then filled with errors and misleading claims.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson