To: xzins
The problem is that a "rotating" federal judiciary would make the judges even MORE PRONE to making rulings based on political ideals. The purpose of a lifetime appointment is to take politics out of their rulings; however, the activist judges use their position to become even more political. I think the real answer is to impeach judges who blatantly disregard the law simply to advance an agenda.
16 posted on
01/06/2005 6:47:26 PM PST by
wagglebee
(Memo to sKerry: the only thing Bush F'ed up was your career)
To: wagglebee
"The problem is that a "rotating" federal judiciary would make the judges even MORE PRONE to making rulings based on political ideals."
I tend to agree. I don't see any use in replacing one bad batch of judges with another. The impeachment hurdle is VERY high (I think 2/3's of the Senate). We probably won't have much luck in that area until we finally finish off the Dems, and some more responsible political party takes their place.
17 posted on
01/06/2005 6:56:44 PM PST by
BobL
To: wagglebee
In my mind, I have acknowledged that they are partisan politicians, and that the power is too great to be withstood by humans.
Rotating them via election recognizes that they are partisan. It provides a means for regular, thoughtful course correction.
19 posted on
01/06/2005 7:01:44 PM PST by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson