Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

The problem is that a "rotating" federal judiciary would make the judges even MORE PRONE to making rulings based on political ideals. The purpose of a lifetime appointment is to take politics out of their rulings; however, the activist judges use their position to become even more political. I think the real answer is to impeach judges who blatantly disregard the law simply to advance an agenda.


16 posted on 01/06/2005 6:47:26 PM PST by wagglebee (Memo to sKerry: the only thing Bush F'ed up was your career)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee
"The problem is that a "rotating" federal judiciary would make the judges even MORE PRONE to making rulings based on political ideals."

I tend to agree. I don't see any use in replacing one bad batch of judges with another. The impeachment hurdle is VERY high (I think 2/3's of the Senate). We probably won't have much luck in that area until we finally finish off the Dems, and some more responsible political party takes their place.
17 posted on 01/06/2005 6:56:44 PM PST by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
In my mind, I have acknowledged that they are partisan politicians, and that the power is too great to be withstood by humans.

Rotating them via election recognizes that they are partisan. It provides a means for regular, thoughtful course correction.

19 posted on 01/06/2005 7:01:44 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson