To: superskunk
"...but politicians cross the line when they try to punish or impeach judges for decisions they do not agree with."
I don't agree - impeachment is a VERY high hurdle to overcome, as we all learned last decade. If a judge makes a decision (or decisions) that is so egregious, that judge should be removed for cause. I remember a federal judge in Pennsylvania who let a big-time drug dealer off scott-free because he thought cops tend to racially profile - no other reason. Clinton tried to elevate him to Circuit Court - but the Republicans pointed to that decision and he withdrew.
34 posted on
01/06/2005 8:55:47 PM PST by
BobL
To: BobL
I agree that impeachment is a difficult process, but I don't think it should be avoided at all costs. I think that if a judges decisions show an overall disregard for the constitution, we should at least try to remove them.
39 posted on
01/06/2005 9:20:11 PM PST by
superskunk
(Quinn's Law: Liberalism always produces the exact opposite of it's stated intent.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson