Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: superskunk
"...but politicians cross the line when they try to punish or impeach judges for decisions they do not agree with."

I don't agree - impeachment is a VERY high hurdle to overcome, as we all learned last decade. If a judge makes a decision (or decisions) that is so egregious, that judge should be removed for cause. I remember a federal judge in Pennsylvania who let a big-time drug dealer off scott-free because he thought cops tend to racially profile - no other reason. Clinton tried to elevate him to Circuit Court - but the Republicans pointed to that decision and he withdrew.
34 posted on 01/06/2005 8:55:47 PM PST by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: BobL
I agree that impeachment is a difficult process, but I don't think it should be avoided at all costs. I think that if a judges decisions show an overall disregard for the constitution, we should at least try to remove them.
39 posted on 01/06/2005 9:20:11 PM PST by superskunk (Quinn's Law: Liberalism always produces the exact opposite of it's stated intent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson