Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

High Court to reconsider Arthur Andersen file-shredding case
AP, via the Houston Chronicle ^ | 1/7/05 | Associated Press

Posted on 01/07/2005 2:17:27 PM PST by Diddle E. Squat

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court said today it will consider overturning Arthur Andersen LLP's conviction for destroying and altering Enron Corp.-related documents.

Justices will review a New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that upheld the former Big Five accounting firm's June 2002 conviction. At issue is whether the jury instructions at trial were too vague and broad for jurors to determine correctly what constituted obstruction of justice.

Andersen was charged with obstruction of justice for inducing mass destruction of Enron-related documents in late 2001 as the Securities and Exchange Commission began investigating the energy company's convoluted finances.

Andersen put in practice a little-known document retention policy that called for destroying unneeded documentation to streamline needlessly fat files.

Enron filed for bankruptcy in December 2001 amid revelations of hidden debt and inflated profits.

Andersen argued during trial that employees who shredded tons of documents followed the policy and there was no intent to thwart the SEC investigation.

Andersen's appeal is backed by the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. It argues in a friend-of-the-court filing that the jury instructions' broad characterization of "obstruction" could unfairly punish criminal attorneys who advise their clients to withhold evidence in legal ways.

The case is Andersen v. U.S., 04-368.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: arthurandersen

1 posted on 01/07/2005 2:17:27 PM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat

"destroying and altering Enron Corp.-related documents"

Rats. I was hoping this was about the Rose Law Firm. But of course, that headline would've read "Vince Foster and Hillary"...oh, wait a minute. Never mind.


2 posted on 01/07/2005 2:20:38 PM PST by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson