Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Salvador Option’. Pentagon may put Special-Forces-led assassination teams in Iraq
MSNBC/Newsweek ^ | Jan. 8, 2004 | Michael Hirsh and John Barry

Posted on 01/08/2005 9:17:39 PM PST by FairOpinion

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last
To: secretagent

COULD be losing our way? It sounds like we already have. Death squads sound more like something Saddam Hussan would dream up than a way of building democracy to me. If this is a legitimate tool to fight terrorism, I see no indication of it... or a rationale for "secret interrogations".

Not that we're not fighting bad guys, but if we're the good guys, we need to act better and BE better than this.


41 posted on 01/08/2005 11:47:19 PM PST by rpgdfmx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

This should have been the plan the first day after the POS started kidnapping our people. For every one of our people that they killed, 5 of their leaders heads would be displayed in the middle of Baghdad. For every IED exploded, they would have 5 safe houses blown up (preferably with them in them.)

Sooner or later their ability to effectively threaten locals would be minimal, if they were constantly on the run. If locals new that the bad guys wheren't likely to return, they would not be as afraid of them.


42 posted on 01/08/2005 11:53:54 PM PST by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

This article is disinformation, it is not a good starting point for discussion.


43 posted on 01/09/2005 12:14:55 AM PST by Mount Athos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

I agree. First of all we dont know where half these guys are . How the hell can we put hits on them ? If we knew where they are we'd be blowing up the whole bock already .


44 posted on 01/09/2005 12:20:06 AM PST by hineybona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

Comment #45 Removed by Moderator

Comment #46 Removed by Moderator

To: Javelina

Another good point there buddy ..These guy are constantly on the run anyway .We dont have a clue where they are from hour to hour. could be standing 2 feet away from ya sometimes. The article makes it sound like ,at present, we are NOT activly hunting down these guys .


47 posted on 01/09/2005 12:24:16 AM PST by hineybona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: rpgdfmx
Not that we're not fighting bad guys, but if we're the good guys, we need to act better and BE better than this.

"be" better than what? Who is that you think we are targeting other than terrorists? Would you rather than we bombed an entire bock, killing everyone in the vincinity, rather than assassinate one terrorist?

48 posted on 01/09/2005 12:38:57 AM PST by Sunsong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
I take exception with the statement that we are losing, we are winning, but I think we could certainly be more successful if we really took the gloves off.

We may be winning, but we are winning too slowly, which is the same as losing. GWB won't be the President forever. If these 'insurgents' drag this out for a few years, do you trust whoever the next President may be, R or D, to stick it out in Iraq?
49 posted on 01/09/2005 1:12:20 AM PST by jaykay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: secretagent
We could lose our way here.

Or we could find our way here. When in Rome...
50 posted on 01/09/2005 1:14:50 AM PST by jaykay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Once-Ler
We will not defeat terrorists by becoming as ruthless as they are.

Right, we have to be more ruthless than they are.
51 posted on 01/09/2005 1:22:42 AM PST by jaykay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Javelina
Something tells me that people who's primary means of attack is suicide bombing aren't exactly going to be "terrorized" by the threat of death squads.

Have Zarky boy or any of his top goons strapped on a suicide vest and done their own dirty work? Is Osama hiding in his hole in any rush to become a martyr? Did any big time terrorist ever blow themselves up? No, they send illiterate punks who they've mesmerized to do it. When they face death themselves I believe they will stain their panties very badly.
52 posted on 01/09/2005 1:37:55 AM PST by jaykay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Javelina
Something tells me that people who's primary means of attack is suicide bombing aren't exactly going to be "terrorized" by the threat of death squads.
Depends on how creative the death squads get. As Caligula used to say "make him feel that he is dying!"
53 posted on 01/09/2005 1:48:50 AM PST by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
This is more self defense than anything else.

The terrorists have been picking on innocent civilians mostly or Iraqis in positions of leadership.

Any responsible head of a family would prevent thugs from preying on his family.

54 posted on 01/09/2005 2:23:39 AM PST by topher (Pray for our leaders -- let the fighting 109th rip into the Decadency of the Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sunsong
I agree. Kill the killers before they can kill innocent people. No ifs ands or buts. People caught planting IEDs or supporting suicide bombers should be summarily executed. People known to be financing attacks on civilians should be summarily executed. In time, the ruthless bastards will learn that they're not dealing with a weak-willed people but with people who will defend the right of the Iraqi people to become a self-governing democracy and not some playground for sociopathic Islamic nut jobs.
55 posted on 01/09/2005 2:28:59 AM PST by elhombrelibre (Liberalism is proof that intelligent people can ignore as much as the ignorant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis

Barack Obama is the most Hyped Up Human Being Alive Right Now.


56 posted on 01/09/2005 2:42:28 AM PST by cmsgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Wouldn't make a hill of beans difference unless they take out the monstrous old mullahs, who will just go on brainwashing new butchers.


57 posted on 01/09/2005 2:44:09 AM PST by tkathy (Ban all religious head garb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Assassination teams?

Better late than never.

If they do a good job there, we can send them on to Iran, North Korea, Cuba, Syria and Venezuela.
58 posted on 01/09/2005 2:59:09 AM PST by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots

i could'nt agree more. it's a great idea. im so surprised that such a strategy is not constantly in use.


59 posted on 01/09/2005 4:27:01 AM PST by skullocrushah (banzai!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: secretagent

What is an army but a "death squad"? You fight a war with the tactics and materiel appropriate to the situation and the goals. It's not like politics inside a democratic country that is operating by its rules.


60 posted on 01/09/2005 4:49:00 AM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson