Skip to comments.
The Salvador Option’. Pentagon may put Special-Forces-led assassination teams in Iraq
MSNBC/Newsweek ^
| Jan. 8, 2004
| Michael Hirsh and John Barry
Posted on 01/08/2005 9:17:39 PM PST by FairOpinion
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-113 next last
To: secretagent
COULD be losing our way? It sounds like we already have. Death squads sound more like something Saddam Hussan would dream up than a way of building democracy to me. If this is a legitimate tool to fight terrorism, I see no indication of it... or a rationale for "secret interrogations".
Not that we're not fighting bad guys, but if we're the good guys, we need to act better and BE better than this.
41
posted on
01/08/2005 11:47:19 PM PST
by
rpgdfmx
To: FairOpinion
This should have been the plan the first day after the POS started kidnapping our people. For every one of our people that they killed, 5 of their leaders heads would be displayed in the middle of Baghdad. For every IED exploded, they would have 5 safe houses blown up (preferably with them in them.)
Sooner or later their ability to effectively threaten locals would be minimal, if they were constantly on the run. If locals new that the bad guys wheren't likely to return, they would not be as afraid of them.
42
posted on
01/08/2005 11:53:54 PM PST
by
anymouse
To: anymouse
This article is disinformation, it is not a good starting point for discussion.
To: Mount Athos
I agree. First of all we dont know where half these guys are . How the hell can we put hits on them ? If we knew where they are we'd be blowing up the whole bock already .
Comment #45 Removed by Moderator
Comment #46 Removed by Moderator
To: Javelina
Another good point there buddy ..These guy are constantly on the run anyway .We dont have a clue where they are from hour to hour. could be standing 2 feet away from ya sometimes. The article makes it sound like ,at present, we are NOT activly hunting down these guys .
To: rpgdfmx
Not that we're not fighting bad guys, but if we're the good guys, we need to act better and BE better than this. "be" better than what? Who is that you think we are targeting other than terrorists? Would you rather than we bombed an entire bock, killing everyone in the vincinity, rather than assassinate one terrorist?
48
posted on
01/09/2005 12:38:57 AM PST
by
Sunsong
To: FairOpinion
I take exception with the statement that we are losing, we are winning, but I think we could certainly be more successful if we really took the gloves off.
We may be winning, but we are winning too slowly, which is the same as losing. GWB won't be the President forever. If these 'insurgents' drag this out for a few years, do you trust whoever the next President may be, R or D, to stick it out in Iraq?
49
posted on
01/09/2005 1:12:20 AM PST
by
jaykay
To: secretagent
We could lose our way here.
Or we could find our way here. When in Rome...
50
posted on
01/09/2005 1:14:50 AM PST
by
jaykay
To: Once-Ler
We will not defeat terrorists by becoming as ruthless as they are.
Right, we have to be more ruthless than they are.
51
posted on
01/09/2005 1:22:42 AM PST
by
jaykay
To: Javelina
Something tells me that people who's primary means of attack is suicide bombing aren't exactly going to be "terrorized" by the threat of death squads.
Have Zarky boy or any of his top goons strapped on a suicide vest and done their own dirty work? Is Osama hiding in his hole in any rush to become a martyr? Did any big time terrorist ever blow themselves up? No, they send illiterate punks who they've mesmerized to do it. When they face death themselves I believe they will stain their panties very badly.
52
posted on
01/09/2005 1:37:55 AM PST
by
jaykay
To: Javelina
Something tells me that people who's primary means of attack is suicide bombing aren't exactly going to be "terrorized" by the threat of death squads.
Depends on how creative the death squads get. As Caligula used to say "make him feel that he is dying!"
53
posted on
01/09/2005 1:48:50 AM PST
by
GSlob
To: FairOpinion
This is more self defense than anything else.
The terrorists have been picking on innocent civilians mostly or Iraqis in positions of leadership.
Any responsible head of a family would prevent thugs from preying on his family.
54
posted on
01/09/2005 2:23:39 AM PST
by
topher
(Pray for our leaders -- let the fighting 109th rip into the Decadency of the Democrats)
To: Sunsong
I agree. Kill the killers before they can kill innocent people. No ifs ands or buts. People caught planting IEDs or supporting suicide bombers should be summarily executed. People known to be financing attacks on civilians should be summarily executed. In time, the ruthless bastards will learn that they're not dealing with a weak-willed people but with people who will defend the right of the Iraqi people to become a self-governing democracy and not some playground for sociopathic Islamic nut jobs.
55
posted on
01/09/2005 2:28:59 AM PST
by
elhombrelibre
(Liberalism is proof that intelligent people can ignore as much as the ignorant.)
To: Remember_Salamis
Barack Obama is the most Hyped Up Human Being Alive Right Now.
56
posted on
01/09/2005 2:42:28 AM PST
by
cmsgop
To: FairOpinion
Wouldn't make a hill of beans difference unless they take out the monstrous old mullahs, who will just go on brainwashing new butchers.
57
posted on
01/09/2005 2:44:09 AM PST
by
tkathy
(Ban all religious head garb.)
To: FairOpinion
Assassination teams?
Better late than never.
If they do a good job there, we can send them on to Iran, North Korea, Cuba, Syria and Venezuela.
58
posted on
01/09/2005 2:59:09 AM PST
by
Bon mots
To: Bon mots
i could'nt agree more. it's a great idea. im so surprised that such a strategy is not constantly in use.
To: secretagent
What is an army but a "death squad"? You fight a war with the tactics and materiel appropriate to the situation and the goals. It's not like politics inside a democratic country that is operating by its rules.
60
posted on
01/09/2005 4:49:00 AM PST
by
arthurus
(Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-113 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson