Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Slammed For Creating Fake News ("Covert Propaganda" in the War On Drugs)
Seattle Times ^ | Jan. 8 , 2005

Posted on 01/10/2005 2:58:47 AM PST by Wolfie

White House slammed for creating fake news

WASHINGTON — Shortly before last year's Super Bowl, many news stations aired a story by Mike Morris describing plans for a new White House ad campaign on the dangers of drug abuse.

What viewers did not know was that Morris is not a journalist and his "report" was produced by the government, actions that constituted illegal "covert propaganda," according to an investigation by the Government Accountability Office (GAO).

In the second ruling of its kind, the investigative arm of Congress this week scolded the Bush administration for distributing phony, prepackaged news reports that include a "suggested live intro" for anchors to read, interviews with Washington officials and a closing that mimics a typical broadcast news sign-off.

Although television stations knew the materials were produced by the Office of National Drug Control Policy, nothing in the two-minute, prepackaged reports would indicate to viewers that they came from the government or that Morris, a former journalist, was working under contract for the government.

"You think you are getting a news story, but what you are getting is a paid announcement," said Susan Poling, managing associate general counsel at GAO. "What is objectionable about these is the fact the viewer has no idea their tax dollars are being used to write and produce this video segment."

The GAO in May concluded that the Department of Health and Human Services violated two federal laws with similar fake news reports touting the administration's new Medicare drug benefit. When that opinion was released, officials at the drug-control office decided to stop the practice, spokesman Thomas Riley said.

"Our lawyers disagree with the GAO interpretation," he said. Nevertheless, if the video releases were going to be "controversial or create an appearance of a problem," the agency decided it was not worth pursuing, he said.

The prepackaged news pieces represent a fraction of the anti-drug messages distributed by the office, Riley said. Production and distribution of the video news releases cost about $155,000.

Riley said broadcast stations were fully aware they were receiving materials akin to printed press releases that producers could "slice and dice it however they want."

In one video, titled "Urging Parents to Get the Facts Straight on Teen Marijuana Use," news stations were provided a script for the news anchor. It reads: "Despite the fact that marijuana is the most widely used illicit drug among today's youth, many parents admit they're still not taking the drug seriously. Now the nation's drug experts in health, education and safety have joined the drug czar to speak directly to parents about the serious risks of teen marijuana use. Mike Morris has more."

After interview snippets with "drug czar" John Walters, who heads the drug-control policy office, and other experts, the story closes with the voiceover: "This is Mike Morris reporting."

In another, the announcer appears to be "reporting" on a news conference by drug-control officials, when "in reality they are just paid to say a script," Poling said. "In essence, they're actors."

The drug-control agency distributed at least seven packaged news reports to 770 TV stations. At least 300 news shows used some portion of the materials, although it was impossible to determine how many aired the full, prepackaged story or only portions such as "sound bites," Riley said.

If the videos had been identified as coming from the federal agency, that would have been legal, Poling said. But the television package looks like an authentic piece of independent journalism.

"The critical element of covert propaganda is the concealment of the agency's role in sponsoring the materials," GAO wrote to Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., who requested the Jan. 4 report.

"It is illegal to use taxpayer dollars to influence public opinion surreptitiously," Waxman said Thursday. "Unfortunately, this is the second time in less than a year that GAO has caught the Bush administration violating a fundamental principle of open government."

Copyright © 2005 The Seattle Times Company


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: govwatch; propoganda; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

1 posted on 01/10/2005 2:58:47 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
First the Armstrong Williams story surfaces, now this. What's going on in the administration? Who's minding the store?

Leni

2 posted on 01/10/2005 3:03:12 AM PST by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

What! Our “esteemed” news media would actually broadcast a “news” story that was not factually accurate? Who would have thunk it?
What! Our government would actually disseminate misinformation in conjunction with the “War” on Drugs? Who would have thunk it?


3 posted on 01/10/2005 3:09:52 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
"It is illegal to use taxpayer dollars to influence public opinion surreptitiously,"

Oh-oh, sounds like trouble for NPR!

4 posted on 01/10/2005 3:11:09 AM PST by skimbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

That "drug policy news report" story is a year old, and a dead issue. Trying to resurrect it to link it to the Armstrong thing--which I freaked about until I read the actual facts--is pretty lame.


5 posted on 01/10/2005 3:20:19 AM PST by Darkwolf377 (...drowning someone ...I certainly wouldn't have had a part of that... --Capt. Teddy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
It is illegal to use taxpayer dollars to influence public opinion surreptitiously," Waxman said Thursday. "Unfortunately, this is the second time in less than a year that GAO has caught the Bush administration violating a fundamental principle of open government."

as opposed to:

Flashback: Clinton Admin. paid media alter content and promote Drug Czar's agenda

The column by Mathew Miller in the Post Standard (Jan. 22,2000) was distressing to say the least. In it he attempts to say that Drug Czar General Barry McCaffrey, head of the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) was right in trying to influence the media to change the content of our TV shows because he feels the message is a good one....

But this week after revelations that Gen. Barry McCaffrey has been paying the networks to inject his reefer-madness worldview into primetime TV shows, the abbreviation is obvious: it's the Office of National Drug Censorship and Propaganda.

6 posted on 01/10/2005 3:31:19 AM PST by stylin19a (Marines - end of discussion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

The GAO report came out last week. That's not current enough for you?


7 posted on 01/10/2005 4:06:37 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: skimbell

Or PBS! (aptly named)


8 posted on 01/10/2005 4:11:57 AM PST by DTogo (U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
I don't remember any hue and cry when the Clinton administration had apparatchiks inside the CNN newsroom.
9 posted on 01/10/2005 4:26:08 AM PST by metesky ("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

Dums at the GAO, trying to help the idiot party. Maybe the people that wrote this should have a random drug test.


10 posted on 01/10/2005 4:26:11 AM PST by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jmc813; Quick1; gdani; vikzilla; bassmaner; steve-b; steve50; philman_36; headsonpikes; ...

"But Everybody Does It!" ping.


11 posted on 01/10/2005 4:29:26 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marty60
...Maybe the people that wrote this should have a random drug test....

...or a random drug!

12 posted on 01/10/2005 4:34:21 AM PST by pageonetoo (I could name them, but you'll spot their posts soon enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
and a dead issue

Really? You are sure there are ZERO other government propaganda campaigns our tax dollars are funding?

The people paying to have lies spewed at us should be humiliated. Spat on. Their families run out of town. They are subhuman.

13 posted on 01/10/2005 4:51:05 AM PST by eno_ (Freedom Lite, it's almost worth defending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

I'm embarrassed to say it, but the Wax-Man is right on this one.

But WTF? We got a War on Drugs to fight, so anything goes...the end (making a "drug-free" America, whether it be by force or fraud) justifies the means (using the media as propagandist tools of the government, & using our own $ in the process).


14 posted on 01/10/2005 4:55:19 AM PST by libertyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

Anyone who believes the media is falling for fake news.


15 posted on 01/10/2005 5:00:45 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metesky

EVERYTHING that came out of the Clinton Admin was propaganda. Especially the wonderful economic reports that were based on the fraud in the corp community (Enron, Worldcom etc etc) and the irrational exeuberance of the SM.


16 posted on 01/10/2005 5:01:58 AM PST by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

Does Dan Rather know about this?


17 posted on 01/10/2005 5:07:35 AM PST by AlbertWang
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlbertWang

Yeah, why isn't donkey dan all over this? Could he be losing his touch?


18 posted on 01/10/2005 5:24:05 AM PST by tarzantheapeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

So much for the "Adults" being in charge. Just more childish nonsense. Blackbird.


19 posted on 01/10/2005 7:09:47 AM PST by BlackbirdSST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

If CBS can manufacture news, why can't our side?


20 posted on 01/10/2005 7:11:57 AM PST by Lazamataz ("Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown" -- harpseal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson