Skip to comments.
CARDINAL SAYS BUSH BROKE IRAQ PROMISE
YAHOOO VIA AP ^
| 1/10/05
Posted on 01/10/2005 7:29:30 AM PST by areafiftyone
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 201-211 next last
To: Alberta's Child
Bush ought to challenge him to a duel....aka..
Zell Miller....get off my back..you rednecks..Jake
Comment #142 Removed by Moderator
Comment #143 Removed by Moderator
To: Alberta's Child
I think one can make a case for that being true for WWI. I don't think it's justified at all for WWII.
144
posted on
01/10/2005 12:18:00 PM PST
by
kms61
To: net ghost
The Longs were anything but Dixiecrats. Both factions had populist elements, but they were poles apart otherwise.
145
posted on
01/10/2005 12:19:43 PM PST
by
kms61
To: annalex
That was true initially, until the occupied populations in the East found out exactly what Nazi rule entailed. I think it was Solzhenitsyn who said if the Germans had come as liberators instead of conquerors, they would have been met with flowers. But ruthless conquest the ideological linchpin of the whole Nazi invasion in the first place.
146
posted on
01/10/2005 12:25:31 PM PST
by
kms61
To: Max Combined
Here's a clarification . . . The quote about Vietnam was actually from Cardinal Sodano, Vatican Secretary of State. I mistakenly attributed it to Pio Laghi because I had remembered it from an article about an interview he had given in late 2003.
"We spoke a long time about the consequences of a war. I asked: Do you realize what youll unleash inside Iraq by occupying it? The disorder, the conflicts between Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds everything that has in fact happened," the cardinal said. Bush insisted that democracy would be the main result.
147
posted on
01/10/2005 12:26:45 PM PST
by
Alberta's Child
(It could be worse . . . I could've missed my calling.)
To: kms61
I think it applies to World War II simply because World War II was an inevitable result of the aftermath of World War I.
148
posted on
01/10/2005 12:27:58 PM PST
by
Alberta's Child
(It could be worse . . . I could've missed my calling.)
Comment #149 Removed by Moderator
Comment #150 Removed by Moderator
To: ZULU
There is nothing wrong with naked self-interest.Glad to have that on the record. I didn't think I was talking to a real conservative.
Sic deinde quiscumque alius transiliet moenia mea
Charming use of the Latin allusion (you even got the spelling almost right), but you overlook the fact that it's we who jumped over their wall.
151
posted on
01/10/2005 12:35:18 PM PST
by
Romulus
(Is it lawful to heal on the Sabbath?)
To: kms61
The Longs were anything but Dixiecrats."Forget it, he's on a roll."
152
posted on
01/10/2005 12:39:18 PM PST
by
Romulus
(Is it lawful to heal on the Sabbath?)
To: Salvation
With all due respect, Excellency, shut up!
153
posted on
01/10/2005 12:43:06 PM PST
by
Bigg Red
(Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
To: Romulus
"Charming use of the Latin allusion (you even got the spelling almost right), but you overlook the fact that it's we who jumped over their wall."
Did you have to run off to your Latin reference text to check it out. Where is the error?
And we jumped their wall for good reason.
And no one EVER accused ME of being a liberal.
154
posted on
01/10/2005 12:55:33 PM PST
by
ZULU
(Fear the government which fears your guns. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
To: net ghost
That's where I would part company with this administration. Not that President Bush is wrong on principle, mind you -- but that he's trying to lend legitimacy to an international organization that has no legitimacy in my mind. He cannot have it both ways . . . he cannot lay out his vision for a body like the U.N. that has no legal standing in the U.S., and then either use it or ignore it as his own discretion.
This is where the whole argument for war in Iraq falls down. If Iraq had truly represented a direct threat to the U.S., then this administration was grossly irresponsible in allowing any delay that resulted from the whole U.N. charage in late 2002.
155
posted on
01/10/2005 1:01:27 PM PST
by
Alberta's Child
(It could be worse . . . I could've missed my calling.)
To: ZULU
And we jumped their wall for good reason. Because we got whacked on 9/11 and somebody was going to have to pay. And because some foreign policy players saw how to channel this pissed-off-ness in ways that suited their notions of how the world should be rearranged.
As someone who specialises in naked self-interest you ought to be ashamed how little you have to show for this righteous ass-kicking we've been giving. Hoo-ya
156
posted on
01/10/2005 1:19:06 PM PST
by
Romulus
(Is it lawful to heal on the Sabbath?)
To: Alberta's Child
During the election campaign of 2004, this administration never hesitated to seek the help of these "bozos" when it served its own ambitions.Thank you for your measured response.
157
posted on
01/10/2005 1:39:25 PM PST
by
VOYAGER
To: RexBeach
"But, as we all know, it is still BUSH'S FAULT."
LOL! Always, regardless of what one's religion, or lack there of may or may not be.
158
posted on
01/10/2005 1:47:50 PM PST
by
F.J. Mitchell
(The Progrossive Democrats are never so small a minority that they can't screw every thing up.)
To: areafiftyone
Dangerous character, this Pio Laghi. He was the inspiration for one of the main characters in Malachi Martin's novel Windswept House.
To: Romulus
Being fully aware of widespread hostility and ignorance regarding the catholic church, the MSM invents a wedge, and the barking-seal right responds on cue. Bumps.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 201-211 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson