To: .cnI redruM
I'm not impressed. They're still not admitting the memo was a forgery. And they still don't seem a bit peeved that they were taken for a ride. Wouldn't you think a credible news organization would sue the pants off someone who scammed them like this? Yet CBS is just letting the forger off the hook. Doesn't make it with me.
11 posted on
01/10/2005 9:04:38 AM PST by
randita
To: randita
It is better that I thought that they would manage, but they are still drinking the Cool Aid about political bias.
19 posted on
01/10/2005 9:07:03 AM PST by
Agent Smith
(Fallujah delenda est. (I wish))
To: randita
That's a major point. They can't bring themselves to say it was fake, a forgery, phony. If they said that, then the charge of political bias would stick. Their story is "competitive pressure to be first with the story," which is bunk.
25 posted on
01/10/2005 9:09:24 AM PST by
Eric in the Ozarks
(If I've told you once, I've told you a thousand times: No cliches!)
To: randita
"I'm not impressed."
Me either. We haven't heard how much of a severance package all these people are getting. You don't become a scapegoat without being fairly well paid off to keep your mouth shut.
66 posted on
01/10/2005 9:28:47 AM PST by
mass55th
("If I were two faced, would I be wearing this one?"----Abe Lincoln (1809-1865))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson