Those pesky little laws again...
I know the plantiff in the case. The original filing of the case cited the violation of the Constitutional right of presumed innocense and the right to face your accuser in a court a law.
The way it is now you must go to the Traffic Cam vendor's office and sit through a hearing with a court of monkeys(traffic cam company is judge and jury) and prove your innocence before they will waive the fine.
It is a sad statement that the court has basically said it's ok to violate the Constitution, but we won't tolerate the state being screwed out of 90% of the fine.