Posted on 01/11/2005 3:53:02 AM PST by Lindykim
The Christian Underground http://www.christian-underground.com READ IT - LEARN FROM IT - PRAY OVER IT - SHARE IT --- The Ant and the Tsunami Victims: A Marxist Perspective By Nancy Salvato January 10, 2005
Bring on the hate mail. I know I'll be receiving plenty of it from the people who don't want to hear what I'm going to say. To begin with, I'm tired of the hard working people in the United States playing Atlas to those who don't plan beyond the moment or to those who believe that the rest of the world exists to bail them out when they encounter disaster.
Government spending of citizens' hard earned tax dollars to bail out every victim of disaster, poor business practice, or persons lacking in motive to overcome adversity has led to a greatly expanded welfare state and unnecessary regulation of private industry predicated on the idea that the government knows the best way to spend our money and that we exist to take care of those "deemed" unable to meet the demands of society as we know it.
Communism, which forces individuals to sacrifice their own interests for the good of the state, was allegedly defeated at the close of the Cold War. Yet our personal and intellectual freedoms are still under attack by many who play on the collective guilt of those who have achieved wealth through hard work and enterprise; suggesting that they be required to contribute a greater share of their hard earned dollars to take care of those who are not doing as well -without any expectation of return on their money.
It has just come to my attention that Kerry Sieh, a professor of geology at California Institute of Technology, "repeatedly warned Indonesian officials that an earthquake and tsunami would soon strike their shores." Because these officials weren't acting on the warnings, he and his teams began warning people directly. Unfortunately, he couldn't reach all of the people in time.
Now I have complete and utter sympathy for the people who have suffered and lost loved ones due to this tragedy, but I also feel resentment that because their government didn't heed the warnings that other countries have to bail them out.
But this is just the tip of the iceberg. On any given day, you can be sure that people are rebuilding their homes in areas of known mud slides, hurricane force winds, and tornado alleys. People are eating fast foods, not taking care of their bodies, and driving cars irresponsibly. While it is no concern of mine that anyone should want to do such things, it becomes my burden when the government pays the disaster relief or Medicaid costs of those who choose to put themselves in harms way or allows exorbitant punitive damages to be awarded, raising everyone's insurance rates.
We should not bail out individuals who do not use "common sense" or corporations like Chrysler, who does not practice fiscal responsibility. Who can say what might've happened to GM and Ford had we let events unfold as a true capitalist society mandates. We should not regulate some areas but leave others up to chance. The government should not involve itself in areas of private industry - period.
In a true free market, the cream rises to the top. Others will adjust to succeed. Those willing to work will survive one way or another. Those truly unable will be the beneficiaries of the generosity of a people driven to success.
We are not a welfare state. We are a free country and freedom means that you can build your house on a cliff or on the shore or even next to power lines. But with that freedom comes responsibility -for your self. Buy more insurance, find storage for your valuables on safer ground, but don't expect me to pay for your lack of concern or foresight. If I choose to contribute a sum of money to a charity on your behalf, that is up to me. Not up to the government.
Should a person be made to feel guilty for living like the Ant instead of running around like the Grasshopper, who in the original fable dies because he does not live in a collectivist society which exists to take care of him no matter what? The moral of that fable is lost when those sworn to uphold the Constitution no longer believe it protects a person's individual right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Nancy Salvato is the Director of Online Communications at Americans for Limited Government. She is an experienced educator and an independent contractor with Prism Educational Consulting. She serves as Educational Liaison for Illinois' 23rd Senatorial District. She works nationally and locally furthering the cause of Civic Education. Her writing is widely published on the internet and occasionally in print venues such as the Washington Times. Her opinions have been heard on select radio programs across the nation. Additionally, her writing has been recognized by the US Secretary of Education. moderator@christian-underground.com http://www.christian-underground.com/archive/read.php?sid=265 Posted to the CU: 2005-01-10 12:51:25 CST ======================================== We will Pray WHEN we want School - WHERE we want Work - The Street - The Mall - Persecute Us At Your Own Peril! The Christian Underground http://www.christian-underground.com
Like Salvato, I feel tremendous sorrow for those who have suffered and still are doing do. But because I believe in the principles espoused by Salvato, support monies contributed by my family towards the relief effort have been handed over to our church and the Salvation Army who will use it responsibly.
Our gov't confiscated tax dollars on the other hand, will be handed out indiscriminately. Which means that, for instance, the likelihood of the grocer who lost his business receiving the same amount of financial aid as the peddler of children for sex is pretty high. But then Marxism is blind to moral differences because high moral standards can't be allowed to exist in a worldview that believes in and forces 'sameness' upon everyone and everything. Again, like Salvato, my anger is over the fact that our gov't, which long ago adopted a Marxian welfare mentality, forces all of us to hand our hard-earned money over so as to allow for it to be redistributed in proper Marxist fashion. Hence we are forced into subsidizing huge bureaucracies that exist for no other purpose than to redistribute our money to human parasites.......incentive-lackng idlers, the chronically lazy and shiftless, criminals, smut peddlers, and so on.
ping
later
Where was the outcry for world support from the redistributionists when 800,000 Rwandans were systematically exterminated?......or how about for the thousands upon thousands of Sudanese, many of whom are Christian, who are being butchered, raped,starved, and/or enslaved by Muslim extremists?
Where was their cry for world support when Fla was devastated by 3 consecutive hurricanes?
The preceding cases are examples of human secularist/Marxist-motivated double-standards. All of these victims "don't count" as sufferers nor are they deserving of moral consideration under insanity-producing Marxist/secular humanist ideology. Incredibly, all of these sufferers, when viewed through the reality and truth 'distortion lens' of secular humanism/Marxism, come out looking like the villains who 'deserve whatever bad things happen to them'.
>>So...would she run to government to stop the big bad developer who wants to build apartments in her neighborhood? Funny how so many "conservatives" get tripped up on that one.<<
We moved to our house and not long after, the Gov't threw Section 8 housing in.
We now homeschool to avoid the undisciplined children and are saving to move. We did not run to the Gov't, we are taking our own responsibility.
snip...So...would she run to government to stop the big bad developer who wants to build apartments in her neighborhood? Funny how so many "conservatives" get tripped up on that one
Conversely, one might ask if the preceding hypothetical is an argument "in favor of" big gov't and big gov't intrusion? A morally informed, principled people would be capable of dealing with your hypothetical in a manner that excludes the need for big brotherism.
"So...would she run to government to stop the big bad developer who wants to build apartments in her neighborhood?"
If she's in a neighborhood, it would be less than difficult to get her neighbors to "convince" (through development laws, protests, and class action suits) the developers to choose a new place for an apartment complex.
Aside from that, however, it still isn't a matter of government doing with your money what it wishes in this case. In this case, government could be used as an arbiter of its laws that it was founded on. An unbiased over-seer. Thats the reason we haev the government in the first place.
Exactly....the third world country leaders know if a disaster strikes...the rest of the world will rush to bail them out...that's why they spend $0.00 on protecting their own citizens with mundain things like buoys that warn of approaching tidal waves...this is not rocket science folks......
I don't follow what the author is trying to say. That the government should not provide disaster relief? Or does she think hurricanes and tornadoes only destroy property along beachfronts and in narrow little "alleys" that sensible and responsible people can avoid?
snip...Don't forget about all the money redistributed to homeowners. Is this a great country or what?
And your point is?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.