Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kid Rock "Never Booked" at Bush Inaugural Concert
imdb.com news ^ | 1/13/05 | Unknown

Posted on 01/13/2005 6:02:13 AM PST by Iowegian

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: NCPAC
and fundraising.

Oh lord.....does this one fund raise, too? "Send me money to help stop this?"

41 posted on 01/13/2005 8:48:55 AM PST by Howlin (I need my Denny Crane!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
Why all the hostility?? Just use common sense. This story has been flying around all week. Do you not think that if it were true that Kid Rock would be performing at the ball and seeing all this controversy spring up around this performance they wouldn't have issued a statement asap??

I have a hard time believing that there wouldn't have been something along the lines of, "Kid Rock is deeply saddened by the controversy surrounding his performance that the (Whatever) Ball. He has been a strong supporter of the war on terror, the USO, and President Bush's reelection...blah blah blah..." issued the second this group started criticizing his (non)appearance at this ball.
42 posted on 01/13/2005 8:49:52 AM PST by retrokitten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Trippin
I can understand if WND made an honest mistake, but if this was some contrived "scandal" then they should have contrived it with someone else.

YOu can bet it was; if you Google Kid Rock right now, ALL ROADS lead back to World Net Daily. Theirs is the ONLY quote saying he was performing.

43 posted on 01/13/2005 8:50:09 AM PST by Howlin (I need my Denny Crane!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: retrokitten

Now, retro, don't try using "clear" thinking in these discussions..........LOL.


44 posted on 01/13/2005 8:51:41 AM PST by Howlin (I need my Denny Crane!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Well, it is true; and you have to ask yourself WHY those groups felt the need to do this; other than dividing Republicans, of course.

As always, follow the money. Now these groups will get to claim to their followers that they were instrumental in "holding the President's feet to the fire" (to quote an old friend of ours)... that only through their intervention was decency upheld.

Their followers will see that that God has blessed them by providing these watchdogs to advance His holy interests. They will provide more funding.

As for WND, they've become as bad as that other "news" website that seems to specialize in reporting out of context what someone said on TV.

45 posted on 01/13/2005 8:51:45 AM PST by TontoKowalski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Iowegian

This whole thing has been a non-story from the start.


46 posted on 01/13/2005 8:52:21 AM PST by Rebelbase (Who is General Chat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Sorry. You are right. LOL!!!


47 posted on 01/13/2005 8:54:12 AM PST by retrokitten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Iowegian

All of us can be happy now!

Well, except for KR fans, I guess.


48 posted on 01/13/2005 8:55:23 AM PST by k2blader (It is neither compassionate nor conservative to support the expansion of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #49 Removed by Moderator

To: retrokitten
Do you not think that if it were true that Kid Rock would be performing at the ball and seeing all this controversy spring up around this performance they wouldn't have issued a statement asap??

Exactly! He or his reps never denied it at all, did they, until after it was official they wouldn't play.

Then it was the "oh, we were never going to play in the first place" line.

If they weren't playing and didn't want to play they would have denied it on day one.

They didn't. I am sure it is true that he was never going to play. He just wanted to to restart a moribund "career".

50 posted on 01/13/2005 9:21:37 AM PST by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I hope you didn't send money to anybody because of this.

Huh? Send money to whom? What are you talking about?

51 posted on 01/13/2005 9:22:55 AM PST by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: TontoKowalski

You must mean the "copy and pasting" Newsmax!

And "he" is most certainly NOT an "old friend" of ours........LOL.


52 posted on 01/13/2005 9:25:32 AM PST by Howlin (I need my Denny Crane!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy

Connecting the dots is not your strong suit.


53 posted on 01/13/2005 9:25:49 AM PST by Iowegian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy

Tracey Schmitt, spokeswoman for the Presidential Inauguration Committee, says, "He was never booked... I don't know where this came from."


54 posted on 01/13/2005 9:26:06 AM PST by Howlin (I need my Denny Crane!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
They didn't. I am sure it is true that he was never going to play.

Then why are you even arguing about this?? Because of the timing of a press release???

He just wanted to to restart a moribund "career".

And why exactly do you think he needs to "restart" his career? He's not exactly fallen off the face of the earth.

55 posted on 01/13/2005 9:32:52 AM PST by retrokitten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Newsmax. You got it. I love the headlines that imply an exclusive report, but then you read the article and it says, "Tim Russert, speaking with Matt Lauer on the Today Show, said that..."

I try to avoid reading any article posted on FR from them, but the headlines are intriguing and it's only when I'm into the article that I realize the source.

I'm shocked at how you've turned your back on one of your most ardent admirers. I'm going to start holding your feet to the fire until you begin treating lunatics with a little more respect.

That's not the act of a TRUE conservative. LOL!

56 posted on 01/13/2005 9:37:22 AM PST by TontoKowalski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Iowegian
Connecting the dots is not your strong suit.

More like not having weird ideas is more like it.

57 posted on 01/13/2005 10:21:45 AM PST by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy

Are you calling the President's spokesperson a liar? She said Kid Rock was never booked.


58 posted on 01/13/2005 10:45:31 AM PST by Iowegian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Long Cut

It was all just damned tinfoil,that a lot of people here fell for.


59 posted on 01/13/2005 9:02:44 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson