Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I've noticed that Hackworth used to be a frequent guest on several Fox cable news shows, but I haven't seen him for a long time. They must have realized that he's not all that much on the up-and-up.

In some ways, Hackworth is now becoming somewhat like Scott Ritter...........i.e. losing credibility, stature, reputation?

1 posted on 01/13/2005 5:05:53 PM PST by CHARLITE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: CHARLITE

I'd like to know how the heck anyone could authenticate anything from COPIES.


2 posted on 01/13/2005 5:06:42 PM PST by mewzilla (Has CBS retracted the story yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

hackworth lost it long ago... he's part of the moveon.org set...
i hope this report is true, lol....


3 posted on 01/13/2005 5:10:48 PM PST by libbylu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

Great find. Hackworthless has been going downhill in credibility for a long time. While I used to believe in him, after all of his criticism of the Commanding Generals in the Gulf Theater and the President as well as his willing role in helping CBS with Abu Graihb, I think he is as worthless as the perfumed princes he claims to try and expose.


4 posted on 01/13/2005 5:10:51 PM PST by wasp69 ("You're done, Rather! No more 'Divine Right of Kings'!" - Oliver "Buckhead" Cromwell (sorta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE
I`m sure there is someone here that can state for sure but I think there was some issue that led FOX to show him the door.If this is true it could be an additional motivation,that is to destroy the President and get a certain amount of revenge on FOX.
5 posted on 01/13/2005 5:10:54 PM PST by carlr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

I wouldn't doubt the defenders of CBS would use the Pope himself to defend their lying and Un-American activities. I don't know about the Hack but he's been off-the-wall of late. Maybe some of the lead he took has finally gotten to his brain.


6 posted on 01/13/2005 5:11:06 PM PST by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE
WHO gave Mapes the PICTURES of ABU GRAHIB?? Did Nick Berg take any outside pictures while he was hanging on that phone pole there? Did Hackworth give Mapes the photos???

Just the FACT that CBS asked Hackworth to authenticate PROVES Hack is a "fellow traveller" and NOT a friend of the military like he has portrayd himself to be.

7 posted on 01/13/2005 5:12:00 PM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

Hack has been a fool for a long time. He is a self-prompoting blow hard.


8 posted on 01/13/2005 5:12:40 PM PST by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

What these people will never understand is the only thing one has is their credibility and once that is gone; it's gone and you just don't have anything else. You will never be taken seriously.


9 posted on 01/13/2005 5:13:21 PM PST by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

anybody but dan would be responsible. (/s)


10 posted on 01/13/2005 5:13:44 PM PST by ken21 (buenos mucus!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

I remember him on Fox shows too, and then I started thinking "this guy's a crackpot." Shortly thereafter I never saw him again on Fox.


12 posted on 01/13/2005 5:15:54 PM PST by KJC1 (overused DUmmie words: fascist, hubris, disenfranchisement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE
I remember after the failed hostage rescue in Iran, that Hackworth came out defending Carter. At the time, I thought maybe Carter had indeed done one good thing out of all his bad.

I am beginning to suspect Hackworth was an accomplice of the left all along.

14 posted on 01/13/2005 5:17:51 PM PST by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE
CORRECTED LINK SOURCE

16 posted on 01/13/2005 5:18:20 PM PST by Wolverine (A Concerned Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

And like Ritter, he did a huge flip flop.


17 posted on 01/13/2005 5:22:10 PM PST by Andrew LB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE
Someone, I believe on Foxnews, mentioned Hackworth the other day, but for some reason, CBS's report failed to mention him. He has some sort of axe to grind with the President.

I initially liked this guy, but the more I saw of him, the more I distrusted him. He may be one of the most decorated combat veterans, but, in my humble opinion, he's a hamburger short of a Happy Meal!

18 posted on 01/13/2005 5:22:42 PM PST by Road Warrior ‘04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

From WND:

Ret. Col. David Hackworth, one of the most decorated living U.S. soldiers and a WorldNetDaily columnist, helped expose the Iraqi prisoner abuse scandal after learning about it from U.S. troops on the ground.

Hackworth pledges to discuss his role in the international controversy in his next column, scheduled for publication Tuesday.

"The Pentagon hoped it would go away or at least that the responsible high brass would escape untarnished," Hackworth told WND this weekend.

The story began to unravel earlier this year with the actions of Ivan Frederick, father of an Army reservist turned prison guard in Iraq, Staff Sgt. Ivan Frederick, who became the target of an investigation for mistreating prisoners. Photographs of the abuse were beginning to circulate among soldiers and military investigators.

Frederick turned to his brother-in-law, William Lawson, for help. Both feared the younger Frederick would end up taking the fall for what they considered command lapses. So, Lawson sent an e-mail message in March to Hackworth, who is known for challenging the military establishment.

Within minutes, Lawson got a call back from one of Hackworth's associates. The author and commentator put Lawson in touch with the CBS News program "60 Minutes II" and help set in motion events that led to the public disclosure and apologies by President Bush and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.

One irony of the way the story came to light: Lawson first tried to bring attention to the scandal by writing to 17 members of Congress, but, he told the New York Times, he got virtually no response. Now, members of the House and Senate are calling for Rumsfeld's resignation for not bringing the matter to their attention.

Before contacting Hackworth, Lawson said he also went to the Red Cross, members of Congress in both parties and Fox News Channel host Bill O'Reilly.

One major figure in the scandal, a two-star general, has already been reassigned with a new post – running Fort Huachuca in Arizona.

Maj. Gen. Barbara G. Fast, who is now the fort's deputy commander and is serving overseas in Baghdad, will take over as head of the post and its military intelligence school in late summer or early fall. In a recent Army report on the Iraq prisoner abuse scandal, disgraced Brig. Gen. Janis Karpinski, the commander of several military police officers facing criminal charges, identified Fast as the person largely responsible for causing prison overcrowding in Iraq.

Fast has been serving since last summer as intelligence chief for the U.S. military command in Baghdad. In that role, she was the person responsible for approving the release of prisoners who "are of no intelligence value and no longer pose a significant threat" to American forces and allies.

Karpinski told Army investigators looking at prison abuse that Fast "routinely" refused to approve the release of such prisoners even after a military review panel in Iraq had recommended that they be released.


19 posted on 01/13/2005 5:25:46 PM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE
Some of us were picking the charlatan Hackworth apart a long time ago......and we took some slings and arrows for it.

I respect Hack's service, but, of his own choosing, he began going down a path where most conservatives couldn't and wouldn't follow.

I think he became heady with his initial "fame". In order to maintain his status, it looks like he had to become ever more outrageous and controversial.

A petty observation, to be sure, but his TV garb always made him look like he was about ready to smear black stuff on his face and head off for a secret commando mission some where. Hack is very much aging, but the crew cut and black turtle neck seemed to me a phony "tough guy" image he was projecting for the cameras.

Leni

20 posted on 01/13/2005 5:26:23 PM PST by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE
I haven't trusted Hackworth sense I found out one of his favorite pastimes is bashing Oliver North. Also, I picked up his recent book (Steel My Soldiers Heart, I think)--it was an unreadable mess.
21 posted on 01/13/2005 5:28:54 PM PST by silent_jonny (Don't judge me until you've walked a mile in the cheap Chinese shoes I bought at Wal-Mart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE
You could tell by the way that nerd dressed . As a retired Col.something was wrong. He had a case of the wannnaaaabbbeeeesss, real bad, at any cost.
30 posted on 01/13/2005 5:36:26 PM PST by rodguy911 (rodguy911:First let's get rid of the UN and then the ACLU, or vice versa..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE

Your hyperlink doesn't work.

What is the source url?


34 posted on 01/13/2005 5:40:16 PM PST by swilhelm73 (Like the archers of Agincourt, ... the Swiftboat Veterans took down their own haughty Frenchman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CHARLITE
Hackworth, as noted, has all the credentials in the world.
Now the But!
When you begin to undermine the war and the officers in charge, you are no longer the "soldier's soldier" looking out for the "rifleman". You have become part of a nefarious enemy which harms those very troops.

Example 1: from what I've read, there was humiliation and debasement, not torture at Abu Graib. Now, we are limited in tactics and methods for getting information, which could prevent roadside bombs or civilian or political casualties.
Case 1: That is how Hackworth has supported the troops.

Example 2: Rules of Engagement. Can't shoot unless they shoot, instead of "Find the enemy, Kill the enemy!".
Case 2: That is how Hackworth has supported the troops.

He can make all the claims he wants about supporting the troops. He has jeopardized their safety! IMO!
44 posted on 01/13/2005 5:52:13 PM PST by Prost1 (I get my news at Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson