[GSlob]

One would think that on multiple occasions both Powell and Armitage have had sufficient face time with the president to acquaint him with their opinions and views. If that's the case, then why use the media? Public channels of communication in such a case are for those who do not have sufficient access to other means.

[GOP_Proud]

< One would think that on multiple occasions both Powell and Armitage have had sufficient face time with the president to acquaint him with their opinions and views. If that's the case, then why use the media? Public channels of communication in such a case are for those who do not have sufficient access to other means. >

The word "undermine" comes to mind.

[SJackson]

One would think that on multiple occasions both Powell and Armitage have had sufficient face time with the president to acquaint him with their opinions and views. If that's the case, then why use the media? Public channels of communication in such a case are for those who do not have sufficient access to other means.

Their opinions were heard, just not always heeded. Going public is an effective way to change, or at least thwart, administration policies with which they disagree, rather than execute the Presidents policies. I can think of several Powell pronouncements regarding the middle east which made the President appear either indecisive or a liar.