Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dan Middleton

If memory serves, the Israelis rejected the original version of the Bradley as well, for similar reasons.

I would imagine a Merkava-based APC/IFV would have fairly high maintenance cost (all that heavy tank armor and the damage-prone engine/tranny set up). But the crews should be able to survive a frontal hit from just about any RPG/ATGM out there.

Sounds like another example of Israeli ingenuity and common sense in defense matters.


4 posted on 01/14/2005 1:55:52 PM PST by DemforBush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DemforBush
Sounds like another example of Israeli ingenuity and common sense in defense matters.

Agreed. If I'm going into an urban streetfight, I'd rather be in a Merkava.

But then again, the Israelis don't have to worry about getting their armored force halfway round the world to fight. They pretty much drive into combat.

5 posted on 01/14/2005 2:05:22 PM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: DemforBush

"Sounds like another example of Israeli ingenuity and common sense in defense matters."

If only we got the same life & usage out of all our military equipment. I know we do get it out of some but probably not as many as we could.


9 posted on 01/14/2005 4:09:59 PM PST by JSteff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: DemforBush
Sounds like another example of Israeli ingenuity and common sense

Yeah, it's called a performance threshold. Something that fails against known IED/mine threats is as worthless as riding around in a canvas-sided cart.

10 posted on 01/14/2005 8:13:26 PM PST by eno_ (Freedom Lite, it's almost worth defending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson