To: steveegg
I am absolutely convinced that the Dems stole Wisconsin's electoral votes in 2004 and in 2000.
Same-day registration must end. More importantly, a requirement that a voter present a driver's license (or a state-issued "non-driver's license" for those who don't drive), and that the license numbers be keyed in to prevent multiple voting, doesn't seem too opprobrious to me.
Not that I, as a resident of North Carolina, am in any position to criticize Wisconsin's setup. The procedure here is to state your name and address, period. You are then good to go with your vote. The potential for abuse is obvious: I could pick a name out of the phone book, remember the address, and vote in a precinct on the other side of the county -- and then go to my precinct, and cast a "legitimate" vote.
Why are there more safeguards involved with my purchase of a book from Amazon.com than there are with my vote? Which transaction is more important?
41 posted on
01/14/2005 4:14:07 PM PST by
southernnorthcarolina
(OK, Congress is back in session -- Where's my tax cuts for the rich? )
To: southernnorthcarolina
Not that I, as a resident of North Carolina, am in any position to criticize Wisconsin's setup. The procedure here is to state your name and address, period. You are then good to go with your vote. Same here, so complain away.
Why are there more safeguards involved with my purchase of a book from Amazon.com than there are with my vote? Which transaction is more important?
Because the latter actually involves power, something the DemonRATs can't obtain legitimately.
46 posted on
01/14/2005 4:30:01 PM PST by
steveegg
(The secret goal of lieberals - to ensure that no future generation can possibly equal theirs.)
To: southernnorthcarolina
The potential for abuse is obvious: I could pick a name out of the phone book, remember the address, and vote in a precinct on the other side of the county -- and then go to my precinct, and cast a "legitimate" vote. Which is the real reason behind Dem complaints about "long lines": it reduced the number of places fraudulent "multiple voters" could cast ballots at
153 posted on
01/15/2005 6:33:45 AM PST by
SauronOfMordor
(We are going to fight until hell freezes over and then we are going to fight on the ice)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson