Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/14/2005 7:34:58 PM PST by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: RWR8189
WERE THE KILLIAN MEMOS FORGED?

If they were, wouldn't that be a crime? Weren't these being sold to us as government documents?

2 posted on 01/14/2005 7:39:01 PM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Allan

Bump


3 posted on 01/14/2005 7:41:06 PM PST by Allan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

4 posted on 01/14/2005 7:42:29 PM PST by IncPen (Beware the fury of a patient man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

Best dissection of the report yet.


5 posted on 01/14/2005 7:52:28 PM PST by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
Thornburgh and Boccardi sum up: "The Panel cannot conclude that a political agenda at 60 Minutes Wednesday drove either the timing of the airing of the Segment or its content."

Oh Gee .. could it be because by doing so would implement CBS in a crime????

Forging Military Documents is a FEDERAL CRIME!

And THAT is the REAL cover up in this whole report!

6 posted on 01/14/2005 7:55:38 PM PST by Mo1 (Does the distinguished Sen from VT wish to act as our treaty rep. for negotiations with Al Queda?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

Another Emperor's New Clothes liberal media situation.


9 posted on 01/14/2005 7:58:31 PM PST by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

Hillary Clinton figures in.


12 posted on 01/14/2005 8:00:57 PM PST by Texas Songwriter (p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
Where, for instance, did the documents come from?

Check Hackworth's hard drive.

16 posted on 01/14/2005 8:22:20 PM PST by Texasforever (It's hard to kiss the lips at night that chew your butt out all day long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

BTTT


18 posted on 01/14/2005 8:47:52 PM PST by spodefly (This message packaged with desiccant. Do not open until ready for use or inspection.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
Does not finding political bias pay as well as not raising hogs?
19 posted on 01/14/2005 9:04:54 PM PST by FreeKeys ("Of course there's a liberal bias... All the networks tilt left."- SeeBS'Heyward, to Bernie Goldberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

Excellent analysis. They really pick the report to pieces.

There's just one flaw in this article, and it's a big one. Johnathan Last asks WHY the authors of the report failed to hit CBS on the two issues of political corruption forgery. The answer to that question is clear: Because that was their job. It was what they were paid to do.

Last says right near the beginning, in passing: "Compiled by independent investigators Dick Thornburgh and Louis D. Boccardi." Sorry, they are NOT independent investigators. They were paid by CBS and they were heading a team of LAWYERS paid for by CBS. In other words, they had an OBLIGATION NOT TO FIND ANYTHING DAMAGING TO THEIR CLIENT.

"Independent Investigators," my Aunt Tillie.

CBS bought and paid for the investigation and received satisfaction for their money.


20 posted on 01/14/2005 9:12:57 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

The media routinely FLAUNTS it's bias and political agenda! All but these genius's can see it every day. What as-holes.


21 posted on 01/14/2005 9:15:43 PM PST by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
How do you proove documents are forged? It seems the only definitive proof would be to have the purportive author deny them. If the author is dead, I guess it can't be "prooved".

The fact that it is impossible to replicate the documents with the technology that existed at that time is, apparently, meaningless.

The investigation into political bias begins and ends with the statements of the criminals involved.

Quite the "investigation".

22 posted on 01/14/2005 10:04:54 PM PST by mcenedo (lying liberal media - our most dangerous and powerful enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189

The more this report is examined, the crumbier it looks. Tony Blankley pretty much nailed it in a column the other day. Thornburgh acted as CBS's attorney, not as its investigator.


24 posted on 01/14/2005 10:45:12 PM PST by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
This talk of securing an advance for a source and "changing the momentum" of the election is not normal journalistic practice. It is damning stuff.

I think this memo was the smoking gun and should be grounds for a grand jury indictment.

27 posted on 01/14/2005 11:27:35 PM PST by oldbrowser (You lost the election...........get over it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
The report tells us that Mapes and Rather had pursued the story for five years...
...Dick Thornburgh explained on the January 10 NewsHour, "If you're looking for a villain in this story, we have one. It's haste."

Do I really have to comment?

28 posted on 01/15/2005 11:04:41 AM PST by FreeKeys ("...as phony as a Dan Rather memo." -- James Taranto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
"The Panel does not find a basis to accuse those who investigated, produced, vetted or aired the Segment of having a political bias"

"Look Bernie, of course there's a liberal bias in the news.  All the networks tilt left." -- CBS News President ANDREW HEYWARD, to six-time Emmy award winner Bernard Goldberg, quoted HERE and HERE.

29 posted on 01/15/2005 11:13:05 AM PST by FreeKeys (Obviously, SeeBS thinks it's OK to plant "evidence" if you think, or at least hope, someone's guilty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
It is also curious that while the panel could discover no political agenda at CBS, it readily found one elsewhere. Explaining how the authenticity of the documents first came to be questioned, Thornburgh and Boccardi--again without citing evidence--trace this to "some people on the Internet, at first primarily supporters of President Bush with their own conservative political agenda."

See "The WHO Funded It? Fallacy" HERE .

31 posted on 01/15/2005 11:26:33 AM PST by FreeKeys (PROOF of SeeBS fraud: http://freedomkeys.com/w-tangfacts.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
If they were concerned about gaps in Tytell's knowledge, did the panel consult other experts? No. Instead, Thornburgh and Boccardi solicited the opinion of this single expert; then, when he reached an unwanted conclusion, they turned their backs on it.

The report itself is as corrupt as CBS. What a disgrace.

32 posted on 01/15/2005 11:32:35 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RWR8189
The only other possible conclusion is that CBS's promised full accounting is a whitewash.

Yep. That's exactly what it is.

33 posted on 01/15/2005 11:33:55 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson