[ken5050]

I happen to feel thee is much credence in what you say, but allow me to play devil's advocate for a moment. These are fairly massive frauds, and would have to occur over multiple EDs..otherwise the discrepancies would be blatantly obvious. So you'd have to have a great number pf people over many counties in on this, as weel as a great many dumb GOP poll observers. A Ben Franklin said.."three can keep a secret if two are dead.."..How would this be accomplished? You get the vote totals at the precinct levels, where you have officials fro both parties watching, right?..they are phoned in, or sent in on-line..where if they were then changed, the discrepancy would be obvious.. so the only way is to stuff the ballot boxes at the different polling places...The "problems" with this is are

1. As I said..it would require a lot of people..this wouldn't have been the first time, and you'd figure someone would talk, if for no reason than to cut a plea in another matter. The Mafia's code pfOmerta wasn't that effective

2. Even if #1 was possible..you wouldn't know how many votes you'd need to pull out the race.

Thanks..

[afraidfortherepublic]

What I don't think you are seeing, Ken5050, is that fraud only has to occur in the Dem controlled polls. These are the polls that suddenly find a box of uncounted ballots after closing. These are also the polls who turn in their votes last -- after someone has determined how many vote they have to "find". There were too many eyewitness reports of streets clogged with cars around polling places bearing Illinois plates. I'm sure the same thing was seen up north where the "foreign" plates were from MN.

Whe the Dems inMilwaukee demanded and won 900,000 ballots be printed for them -- 4 times the number of voters -- something is fishy.