Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CDB

Even though what he said is almost certainly true.


2 posted on 01/17/2005 5:05:30 PM PST by Aetius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Aetius

Maybe, just maybe, there is a relationship between testosterone levels and the ability to do math and science. Perhaps someone should look into that...


5 posted on 01/17/2005 5:14:56 PM PST by Cowboy Bob (Fraud is the lifeblood of the Democratic Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Aetius

"Even though what he said is almost certainly true."

We've had good research data for thirty years and more that demonstrate the plain validity of his comments.


"this room full of the country's most accomplished scholars on women's issues in science and engineering,"

If this Midol-deprived idiot-chick were right, she'd have a "room full of accomplished woman scholars in science and engineering."

But she doesn't. She has a bunch of liberal arts types who probably can't do basic calculus, bloviating about "women's issues."

Studies have verified that only about 15% of the human race has the aptitudes to be successful engineers. They really are, like artists, born not made. And very few of that small minority are female.


12 posted on 01/17/2005 5:29:54 PM PST by hinckley buzzard (the smirking face of a flesh-eating virus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Aetius

Uh no, it's not almost certainly true.


29 posted on 01/17/2005 6:35:38 PM PST by OldFriend (PRAY FOR MAJ. TAMMY DUCKWORTH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Aetius
Of course Summers is right.

Take a look at the preferences for men and women. Women do not gravitate science and math. Its not just enrollment numbers that prove this fact. Just go to any Trekkie convention or comic book store and see if you can find a girl. Women gravitate towards other fields, like psychology and communications, where conversely, areas where its hard to find guys whose claim to fame is that they are a 39th level Beastlord in Everquest.

Of course liberals make the claim that all of these are artificial gender roles enforced by an oppressive phallocracy, while at the same time, arguing that being “gay” is “natural”.

60 posted on 01/18/2005 1:40:03 PM PST by KC_Conspirator (This space outsourced to India)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Aetius

''The psychological literature is clear that there are unintentional biases in judgment that lead to women's contributions being undervalued," she said. ''Unless one specifically grasps these biases and puts mechanisms in place to combat them, it's easy to find yourself in situations like this." Grosz said she signed the letter.


Oops, sorry, you should ignore the post. Prof. Grosz is a FEMALE science professor at Harvard.


61 posted on 01/18/2005 1:40:08 PM PST by FreeTheHostages
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Aetius
to a certain extent, but then again if someone even suggested that women are the nuturers in the family and should always get custody, imagine the uprising....

I am sure the female scienctists feel the same way....

64 posted on 01/18/2005 1:45:58 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson