Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: justshutupandtakeit
"... "Arms" are weapons which a man could carry. Firearms are those which use gunpowder and can be carried. Those claiming that the amendment allows possession of any and all weapons are guilty of reading into the document those things they wish."

If that's the case, how can we then explain the relevant passage in the US Constitution which allows for Congress to write out 'Letters of Marque' -- presumably to private citizens who owned seagoing cutters and pinnaces loaded with cannon?

This wouldn't apply to US Navy ships, considering that the US Constitution compels Congress to fund the US Navy.

If not the Navy, then who did the Framers intend for it to apply to?

135 posted on 01/18/2005 3:10:33 PM PST by The KG9 Kid (Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: The KG9 Kid

Privateers were a sort of Naval Militia that the fedgov used as an auxillary since the Congress refused (under the Jeffersonian influence) to adequately fund a US Navy. It, at times, also forbid the arming of private vessels.

Arms generally meant small arms whereas artillary referred to cannons, etc. Arms were what the soldier carried in armies and militia while the artillary almost always belonged to the militia troop. Cavalry was also generally not militia.


183 posted on 01/18/2005 8:39:54 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson