Unless he has the problems of a Mr. Kerik, and there is no indication of such problems, he has no need to cede any ground to the gungrabbers. We won. We have the votes in Congress to pass good legislation. In my opinion, even on the Judiciary committee we have the votes to confirm appointees.
As the NRA has it:
Of the 251 candidates endorsed by NRA for the U.S. House of Representatives, 241 candidates won. 14 of the 18 NRA-endorsed U.S. Senate candidates won their races.
I say there is no need for us to stand around hat in hand like we didn't win. We have to remove this mindset that most people are against gun ownership -- that's the reverse of the facts here in these United States:
Guns, Gun Ownership, & RTC at All-Time Highs, Less "Gun Control," and Violent Crime at 27-Year Low
Guns. The number of privately owned guns in the U.S. is at an all-time high. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE) estimates that there were about 215 million guns in 1999,1 when the number of new guns was averaging about 4.5 million (about 2%) annually.2 A report for the National Academy of Sciences put the 1999 figure at 258 million.3 According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, there were 30.7 million approved (new and used) NICS firearm transactions between 2000 2003.4
Gun Owners. The number of gun owners is also at an all-time high. The U.S. population is at an all-time high (about 294 million), and rises about 1% annually.5 Numerous surveys over the last 40+ years have indicated that just under half of all households have at least one gun owner.6 Some surveys since the late 1990s have indicated a smaller incidence of gun ownership,7 probably because of some respondents` concerns about "gun control," due perhaps to the policies of the Clinton Administration.
Right-to-Carry. The number of RTC states is at an all-time high, up from 10 in 1987 to 38 today.8 In 2003, states with RTC laws, compared to other states, had lower violent crime rates on average. Total violent crime was lower by 27%, murder by 32%, robbery by 45%, and aggravated assault by 20%.9
"Less Gun Control." As violent crime has declined, many "gun control" laws have been eliminated or made less restrictive. Many states have eliminated prohibitory or restrictive carry laws, in favor of RTC laws. The federal Brady Act`s waiting period on handgun sales ended in 1998, in favor of the NRA-supported National Instant Check, and some states thereafter eliminated waiting periods, purchase permit requirements, or other laws delaying gun sales. The federal "assault weapon" ban expired. All states now have hunter protection laws, 46 have range protection laws, 45 prohibit local jurisdictions from imposing gun laws more restrictive than state law, 44 protect the right to arms in their constitutions, and 33 prohibit frivolous lawsuits against the firearm industry.10
Studies by and for Congress, the Congressional Research Service, the Library of Congress, the National Institute of Justice, the National Academy of Sciences, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and researchers who support "gun control," have found no evidence that "gun control" reduces crime.11
Crime. The FBI reports that the nation`s total violent crime rate declined every year between 1991 200312 and in the first six months of 2004.13 In 2003, the violent crime rate fell to a 27-year low, lower than any time since 1976. Murder rates, while fluctuating slightly, have been lower in recent years than at any time since 1965. The 2003 robbery and aggravated assault rates were lower than any time since 1968 and 1984, respectively. Since 1991, total violent crime has decreased 37%; murder and non-negligent manslaughter, 43%; rape, 24%; robbery, 48%; and aggravated assault, 32%.14
I believe that he would be confirmed if he had said "I believe that the 2nd Amendment is an individual right" in answer to questions about the AWB, and he could have cited the recent DOJ report. Instead, he uttered CPHV propaganda about police officers fearing armed citizens: "I worry about his safety and the types of weapons he will confront on the street."
Sure, Senator Kennedy would do the same thing that he did at Attorney General Ashcroft's confirmation (and remember, Attorney General Ashcroft had a good pro-gun record and was confirmed), but Senator Kennedy has acted that way for umpteen years and few but his loyal voters in Massachusetts pay any attention to his booze-fueled fulminations. Senator Schumer will say something nutty and Senator Feinstein will do some lefty-loony-tunes for the CPVH types, but that's all par for that course.
We won in the election and we should advance, not retreat or hang our heads, or try to play sly word games. When we are ahead, we should press our advantage, not hang around playing prevent defense.