Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: snowsislander

Looks like Bush is pulling out all the stops because he knows he cannot be realected. So we have his administration pushing Pro-Illegal, Anti-Gun, Anti-Profiling, Pro La Raza types. But not to worry the supposed conservatives will be posting shorly about how even Gonzales's anti-Gun stance really isn't anti-gun.


20 posted on 01/18/2005 12:48:15 PM PST by JustAnAmerican (Being Independent means never having to say you're Partisan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JustAnAmerican
I can't see how anybody would think that a Bush nominee is going to be 100% forthright with his Senate interrogators. Especially if his position has no bearing on the issue.

Were he to say that he was opposed to the ban, it would be something the dems would use against him, possibly deny him confirmation.

Albert may well support the ban, but based only on this event, it would be hard to say for sure.

On the other hand, if he has past history or paper trail indicating support for the ban, you would say that the statement to the senators is confirmation.

Have you ever been in a job interview and told the man what he wanted to hear?

40 posted on 01/18/2005 1:10:51 PM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: JustAnAmerican

Waaaaallll ... it depends on how you define the meanin' of anti gun .... LOL ...


166 posted on 01/18/2005 6:22:14 PM PST by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson