Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Huck

Good to know prior to any judicial opening: we don't need another Dave Souter.


49 posted on 01/18/2005 1:15:48 PM PST by Meldrim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Meldrim
Good to know prior to any judicial opening: we don't need another Dave Souter.

Why? You think the kool aid drinkers won't support him anyway? Haven't you heard? GWB is infallible. Bow to his will.

53 posted on 01/18/2005 1:19:59 PM PST by Huck (I only type LOL when I'm really LOL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Meldrim
we don't need another Dave Souter

Left-wacko Molly Ivins grudgingly approves of the way Bush moderated the Texas courts. The Texas trial lawyers' association similarly approved.

It's hard to change the courts by changing the judges; it would be easier to change the court by modifying its jurisdiction, as congress has the power to do.

93 posted on 01/18/2005 1:57:32 PM PST by Tauzero (Every pocket knife confiscated from an innocent person is a failure of security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson