I would hazard a guess that you "conserve" electricity, as if the energy you "saved" by turning down that dimmer switch was being stored in a big battery somewhere. I don't have a problem with cheap crackpots such as you who "conserve" things that don't need conserving. If that makes you happy, fine. I do have a problem when they think that delude themselves into thinking that they're performing a civic good. That's not a characteristic of conservatism, but of the loony left.
What on earth did I post to lead you to jump to that ridiculous conclusion?
Sure, I take advantage of a couple programs offered by my electric utility which are intended to reward reduced demand during peak times. Perhaps you'd be surprised to learn that I don't rearrange my family's entire life to maximize those savings.
So, forgive me if I disappoint you in possessing at least a rudimentary understanding of the economics of electric power. As I see it, reducing peak demand translates to fewer power plants and consuming less fuel (I really hate it when they use gas).
cheap crackpots such as you
Yet another example of your great insight.
It seems like some people -- especially conservatives -- fear any "admission" of conservation would pose a serious threat to their manhood. I can only guess such a person must have quite a fragile manhood for cause to be so insecure from such a logically conservative position.
The only thing I will say on the "conserve energy" topic is that I try to do it where practical. Turning off the light switch doesn't slow the production of electricity at the generating station, but it does help lower my electric bill. To me, the optimum solution is one where the balance in my bank account is maximized and my living expoenses are minimized. No point in cutting to the bone if it isn't cost effective. There is a point of diminishing returns with respect to energy conservation.