Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Study: Notifying parents wouldn't curb teen sex
NY Daily News ^ | January 19, 2005

Posted on 01/19/2005 12:00:57 PM PST by presidio9

Requiring teens to get parental consent before receiving prescription contraceptives likely would result in an increase in pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases, according to a study in today's Journal of the American Medical Association. The study concluded that parental notification laws would not reduce the number of teens having sex and could cause a troubling number of girls to engage in unsafe intercourse, a survey of teens in 33 states suggests.

Nearly one in five teen girls surveyed at federally funded family planning clinics nationwide said they either would use no birth control or depend on unreliable methods, the study said. Only 7% said they would stop having sex if parental-notification laws were enacted, according to the study by The Alan Guttmacher Institute, an advocacy group that supports reproductive choice.

The results, based on responses from 1,526 girls younger than 18 who were given anonymous questionnaires, echo smaller, more local studies.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: perversion; promiscuous
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

1 posted on 01/19/2005 12:00:58 PM PST by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Sounds like some parents need to engage in some serious ass wupping.


2 posted on 01/19/2005 12:02:39 PM PST by Mr.Pinette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

This is not a scientific study.

This "study" is going by what girls at a planned parenthood type of clinic say they would do.

A non story


3 posted on 01/19/2005 12:03:49 PM PST by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

What exactly is "unsafe intercourse"?


4 posted on 01/19/2005 12:05:06 PM PST by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: petitfour

Not sure, but I bet this person would know.

5 posted on 01/19/2005 12:08:43 PM PST by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
according to the study by The Alan Guttmacher Institute, an advocacy group that supports reproductive choice.

'Nuff said.

6 posted on 01/19/2005 12:10:06 PM PST by newgeezer (fundamentalist, regarding the Constitution AND the Holy Bible, i.e. words mean things!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
The results, based on responses from 1,526 girls younger than 18 who were given anonymous questionnaires

I wonder if the parents were advised their daughters were given this questionnaire in the first place. No need to answer, I already know.

7 posted on 01/19/2005 12:11:37 PM PST by lindor (If con is the opposite of pro, is Congress the opposite of Progress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

My local pharmacy keeps the birth control items in a locked cabinet. Totally moronic.


8 posted on 01/19/2005 12:11:42 PM PST by Modernman (What is moral is what you feel good after. - Ernest Hemingway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

As always, the state resents relationshipss with and ifluences on children that compete with its own. Including and especially that of parents.


9 posted on 01/19/2005 12:15:59 PM PST by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Modernman

"My local pharmacy keeps the birth control items in a locked cabinet. Totally moronic.

"

Wow! That IS silly. Here, and in CA, where I used to live, condoms are sold on the open shelves in supermarkets, along with contraceptive foam and other stuff. You do have to have a prescription for the pill, though.


10 posted on 01/19/2005 12:22:12 PM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
This "finding" is not logically applied, IMHO.

I believe the report is reporting upon "low-income" teen behavior; having witnessed up close what does or does not go on in the life of a low-income teen. This report does not at all cover what demographics were "surveyed".

11 posted on 01/19/2005 12:23:16 PM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarkytart
This "study" is going by what girls at a planned parenthood type of clinic say they would do.

Exactly. Or those girls who go to their family doctors (without telling their parents) for birth control as this "study" is affiliated with the AMA.

Girls who just say no will never be reflected in these types of "studies."

12 posted on 01/19/2005 12:26:12 PM PST by An American In Dairyland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
Wow! That IS silly. Here, and in CA, where I used to live, condoms are sold on the open shelves in supermarkets, along with contraceptive foam and other stuff. You do have to have a prescription for the pill, though.

IMHO, keeping birth control items near the pharmacy always gave me the impression that people consider condoms et al. to be some sort of bad, dirty things. Why not keep them near other personal items, such as toothpaste and deodorant?

13 posted on 01/19/2005 12:28:39 PM PST by Modernman (What is moral is what you feel good after. - Ernest Hemingway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Modernman
My local pharmacy keeps the birth control items in a locked cabinet. Totally moronic.

Birth control items are often locked up because they are often stolen. People are embarassed to go up to the cashier (especially in a local pharmacy where they might know the cashier or other customers in line) and buy condoms or whatnot, so they slip them into their coats and walk away.
14 posted on 01/19/2005 12:31:34 PM PST by nyg4168
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nyg4168
Birth control items are often locked up because they are often stolen. People are embarassed to go up to the cashier (especially in a local pharmacy where they might know the cashier or other customers in line) and buy condoms or whatnot, so they slip them into their coats and walk away.

I guess that makes sense. However, by locking them up, the pharmacies are discouraging people from buying them and encouraging unsafe sex. I think most people have been in a situation where even though they could not procure birth control, they still engaged in sex.

15 posted on 01/19/2005 12:34:20 PM PST by Modernman (What is moral is what you feel good after. - Ernest Hemingway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Modernman

"IMHO, keeping birth control items near the pharmacy always gave me the impression that people consider condoms et al. to be some sort of bad, dirty things. Why not keep them near other personal items, such as toothpaste and deodorant?"

Well, at my local Cub supermarket, they're shelved next to the feminine hygiene products. Since most men won't go within two aisles of that section, it seems unlikely that they'd be buying them. I guess it's mostly women buying condoms.

Gotta run, though. My wife's out of tampons. I'll be back shortly.


16 posted on 01/19/2005 12:34:53 PM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Amazing... the abortion industry knows more about the risks involved for teenage girls than their parents do. I do think parental notification is a good idea and ought to be mandatory. If I were a parent, I'd want to know before my daughter has a dangerous operation. Schools can't prescribe aspirin without getting a parental OK and it should be even more true of an abortion, a far more risky and invasive procedure.


17 posted on 01/19/2005 12:35:39 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
or depend on unreliable methods

Planned Parenthood (euphemism: federally funded family planning clinic)would definitely consider abstinence an "unreliable method."

18 posted on 01/19/2005 12:35:43 PM PST by formercalifornian (Daschle b-gone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Modernman

What is "unsafe sex"?

Why are prescription medicines kept in locked areas of drugstores?


19 posted on 01/19/2005 12:43:03 PM PST by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
CWA Says JAMA Study Is ‘Politicized Science’ 1/19/2005

Washington, D.C. – Concerned Women for America (CWA) today discounted the newly released Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) study, which claims that parental notification for minors to receive prescription contraception will lead to more unplanned pregnancies and a rise in the rate of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs).

“The highly touted conclusion of a study authored by researchers associated with the Alan Guttmacher Institute, which is affiliated with Planned Parenthood, should be considered suspect,” said Wendy Wright, CWA’s senior policy director. “Planned Parenthood is afraid of losing business if parents are involved in their kids’ lives. Interestingly, the study notes that a parental notification requirement would cause adolescents to go to private physicians rather than family planning clinics. Not noted is that this would result in family planning clinics such as Planned Parenthood losing clients, losing the financial benefits of selling contraception, sexually transmitted disease testing and abortion to girls who are sexually active without their parents’ knowledge.”

The study claims that parental notification for contraception services contributes to an increase in teen births, referring to a prior study that reached this false conclusion. That study asserted that McHenry County in Illinois had an increase in teen births after parental notification for contraception was initiated. This is not accurate. The parental consent requirement in McHenry County only applies to girls 17 and younger, yet the prior study included births to 18 year olds. In fact, teen births among women 17 and younger decreased.

“Policy-makers need to stop treating parents as a suspect-class, presumed not to have their own kids’ best interests at heart. Adolescents benefit when their parents are involved in their lives and policy-makers shouldn’t forbid their involvement in their daughters’ and sons’ most important decisions,” said Wright.

20 posted on 01/19/2005 12:43:55 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson