You're a real twit. I worked for an NGO and had many friends who dealt personally (professionally) with the sex trade problem. I contributed money to the cause. There were some other involvements that (I have reason to believe) put some of these creeps into jail, or at least deported.
Now, you come to the table with some gross generalizations which I know from actually being there to be absolutely false. You won't admit it, but they are false.
And instead of questioning (let alone researching) your own mistaken assumptions, you just keep walking down the road of ignorance.
I'm flaming because it is knuckleheads like you who irk me. You just keep the (un)subtle insults flying while having not the faintest idea what you're talking about. You'd be a charicature of pompous naivete if you weren't so annoying.
You're a real twit. I worked for an NGO and had many friends who dealt personally (professionally) with the sex trade problem. I contributed money to the cause. There were some other involvements that (I have reason to believe) put some of these creeps into jail, or at least deported. Now, you come to the table with some gross generalizations which I know from actually being there to be absolutely false. You won't admit it, but they are false.
And instead of questioning (let alone researching) your own mistaken assumptions, you just keep walking down the road of ignorance.
I'm flaming because it is knuckleheads like you who irk me. You just keep the (un)subtle insults flying while having not the faintest idea what you're talking about. You'd be a charicature of pompous naivete if you weren't so annoying. So in other words, you are given to personal fits, your reading comprehension has not improved, and you have no evidence you have done more than the journalist quoted in this article.
Yet you are here and it seems as if you are defending this modern evil, at least in the context of the Western male tourists on the prowl for prey.