Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cheney voices concern that Israel may attack Iran
The Jerusalem Post ^ | 20 January 2005 | JPOST.COM STAFF

Posted on 01/20/2005 1:01:34 PM PST by anotherview

Jan. 20, 2005 22:25
Cheney voices concern that Israel may attack Iran
By JPOST.COM STAFF

Vice President Dick Cheney voiced concern Thursday that Israel may decide to act first against Iran to eliminate the possibility of a nuclear threat.

"If, in fact, the Israelis became convinced the Iranians had significant nuclear capability, given the fact that Iran has a stated policy that their objective is the destruction of Israel, the Israelis might well decide to act first, and let the rest of the world worry about cleaning up the diplomatic mess afterwards," Cheney said in an interview aired on MSNBC on the day that George W. Bush was sworn into office for his second term as president.

"You look around the world at potential trouble spots, Iran is right at the top of the list," Cheney said


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: axisofevil; cheney; dickcheney; iran; iraniannukes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-166 next last
To: Righter-than-Rush

>>Cheney just raised the pucker factor>>

LOL!!! I am going to steal that term.

The leaders over there have puckered so tight by now when they break wind only the dogs can hear it.


41 posted on 01/20/2005 1:30:14 PM PST by Abathar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: lawnguy

One nuke in Tel Aviv would be the end of the state of Israel.


42 posted on 01/20/2005 1:30:59 PM PST by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #43 Removed by Moderator

To: anotherview

Seems like a warning to Iran. We won't hold Israel back from hitting you, so get rid of your nukes.


44 posted on 01/20/2005 1:31:42 PM PST by West Coast Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anotherview; biblewonk

Cool!


45 posted on 01/20/2005 1:33:13 PM PST by newgeezer (When encryption is outlawed, rwei qtjske ud alsx zkjwejruc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anotherview
Is that concern or a hope?

Deja vu?

Israel prevented atomic disaster in 1981

Today on Ivry's [Ambassador to US in 91, head of IAF in 81] embassy office wall there is a large black-and-white photograph taken by satellite 10 years after the raid, at the time of the Gulf War. It shows the wreckage of the huge reactor complex, which is still surrounded by a high, thick wall that was supposed to protect it. Trees are growing where the reactor dome had been.

The picture has this handwritten inscription. ``For Gen. David Ivry, with thanks and appreciation for the outstanding job he did on the Iraqi nuclear program in 1981--which made our job much easier in Desert Storm." The author of the inscription signed it: ``Dick Cheney, Sec. of Defense 1989-93."

46 posted on 01/20/2005 1:34:27 PM PST by SJackson ( Bush is as free as a bird, He is only accountable to history and God, Ra'anan Gissin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: powderblue67
What are Israelis capabilites for longer range missions anyone???

The IAF bombed the PLO when they were in Tunis, Tunisia. They have F-15Cs (the Israelis adapted them to the strike role, though they are rarely used for that), F-15Is (essentially the same as the F-15E Strike Eagle), F-16s of various blocks (up to and through Block 50/52), and 707 tanker aircraft, so they're well-suited for long-range strikes.

47 posted on 01/20/2005 1:34:57 PM PST by steveegg (The secret goal of lieberals - to ensure that no future generation can possibly equal theirs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: All

I'm afraid that what is really going to happen is similar to Iraq. First a lot of useless U.N bickering about whether it's right or not. lot's of useless U.N. resolutions respectfully demanding they disarm, and just on the brink of full scale nuclear warfare, either us or the Isreali's will have to take action. I'm afraid that is really what may happen, not to deny that I would just love to wake up one morning, check Freep, and see that Iran is no longer even close to being a threat to anyone.


48 posted on 01/20/2005 1:35:19 PM PST by groovejedi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: anotherview

Shi'ite happens!


49 posted on 01/20/2005 1:36:06 PM PST by dennisw (G_D: Against Amelek for all generations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: powderblue67

That would be Boeing 707 tanker aircraft, not 707 planes :-)


50 posted on 01/20/2005 1:37:35 PM PST by steveegg (The secret goal of lieberals - to ensure that no future generation can possibly equal theirs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; ...
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

For Gen. David Ivry, with thanks and appreciation for the outstanding job he did on the Iraqi nuclear program in 1981--which made our job much easier in Desert Storm.
Dick Cheney

51 posted on 01/20/2005 1:37:48 PM PST by SJackson ( Bush is as free as a bird, He is only accountable to history and God, Ra'anan Gissin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: powderblue67
" Now they would have to fly over Jordan and Iraq. I can imagine Johnny Iraqi would kick up serious shit about it. What are Israelis capabilites for longer range missions anyone???"

Israel has numerous options. Option #1 would be to use its conventional and/or nuclear cruise missiles launched from its 3 submarines. Option #2 would be a direct air attack. Option #3 would be a commando raid (or series of raids). Option #4 would be an ICBM attack. Option #5 would be to finance a student uprising/coup, etc...

52 posted on 01/20/2005 1:37:48 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: TheDon

No, one nuke in Tel Aviv would be the end of Iran.


53 posted on 01/20/2005 1:37:50 PM PST by LiveFree99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: anotherview

Who is he talking to and exactly what is he saying?


54 posted on 01/20/2005 1:39:45 PM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Allan
Did Cheney actually say anything to indicate "concern"? I suspect that that is journalistic (mis)interpretation.

Maybe the headline writer should have called it a warning to Iran rather than an expression of concern.

55 posted on 01/20/2005 1:40:27 PM PST by Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TheDon
One nuke in Tel Aviv would be the end of the state of Israel.

Iran has every intention of delivering just that.
The Israelis won't let them get the chance. They have anywhere from 200 to 400 nukes, including thermonuclear weapons (H-bombs). They also believe in the "Samson Option".

56 posted on 01/20/2005 1:40:57 PM PST by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: notorious vrc

Is that concern or a hope?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I thought the same exact thing when I read the heading...before I saw your post.



Me three


57 posted on 01/20/2005 1:41:16 PM PST by JoeV1 (The Democrats-The unlawful and corrupt leading the uneducated and blind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Southack

I reckon option 2 would still be the most likely


58 posted on 01/20/2005 1:41:29 PM PST by powderblue67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Dark Wing

It may be starting.


59 posted on 01/20/2005 1:43:12 PM PST by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dark Skies

I agree..except look for the feint..With attention focused on Iran..we can take out Syria quickly, then encourage and aid the Iranian dissidents to toss out the mullahs..


60 posted on 01/20/2005 1:44:08 PM PST by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-166 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson