Posted on 01/21/2005 5:08:41 PM PST by quidnunc
Then don't read it, it's not like the title was misleading.
Why post it though? Really, I'm interested.
Because it is apparent to me that Britain is well along on the road to national extinction.
Their society seems in an increasing state of cultural decay and they are about to surrender their sovereignty to the EU.
While Tony Blair supports us in Iraq, at least for the time being, there is a deep vein of anti-Americanism and Judeophobia apparent in popular opinion which is the direct result of BBC propaganda.
We tend to look at the Brits through the lens of WW II and the Blitz, which emphacizes the stiff-upper-lip attitude which we tend to associate with the Brits.
It is apparent to me that that Britain no longer exists, and we need to recognize Britain for what it is today a fever swamp of post-modernism, multiculturalism and political correctness.
For all I know you may be right but you do seem to be more than a tad obsessive on the subject.
May I suggest that, if you are that concerned with dhimmitude, then perhaps you should be rather more preoccupied with murder in New Jersey instead of billboard vandalism in Bedfordshire.
For all I know you may be right but you do seem to be more than a tad obsessive on the subject.
May I suggest that, if you are that concerned with dhimmitude, then perhaps you should be rather more preoccupied with murder in New Jersey instead of billboard vandalism in Bedfordshire.
Dur sorry for double post
you advocate for violent destruction of personal property, disciple. That proves your judgement on anything else, for any legal purpose, is warped beyond the limits of our laws here.
go home to your muslim brethren.
I do not believe any thing you say.
any person who would advocate the destroying of private property, cannot be trusted when it comes to the area of telling the truth about their background.
you are at heart a muslim apologist for the illegal destruction of private property, contrary to the laws of the United States.
you need to brush up on your dissimulating skills:
APPENDIX I TAQIYAH Or DISSIMULATION
'Allamah Tabataba'
One of the most misunderstood aspects of Shi'ism is the practice of dissimulation or taqiyah. With the. wider meaning of taqiyah. "to avoid or shun any kind of danger," we are not concerned here. Rather, our aim is to discuss that kind of taqiyah in which a man hides his religion or certain of his religious practices in situations that would cause definite or probable danger as a result of the actions of those who are opposed to his religion or particular religious practices.
Among followers of the different schools of Islam, Shi'ites are well kndwn for their practice of taqiyah. In case of danger they dissimulate their religion and hide their particular religious and ritual practices from their opponents.
The sources upon which the Shi'ites base themselves in this question include the following verse of the Holy Quran: "Let not the believers take disbelievers for their friends in preference to believers. Whoso doeth that hath no connection with Allah unless (it be) that ye but guard yourselves against them [tattaqu minhum. from the same root as taqiyah], taking (as it were) security [tuqatan. again from the same root as taqiyah]. Allah biddeth you beware (only) of Himself. Unto Allah is the journeying" (III, 28). As is clear from this sacred verse, God, the,Most Exalted, forbids with the utmost emphasis wilayah (meaning in this case friend- ship and amity to the extent that it affects one's life) with un- believers and orders man to be wary and have fear in such a situation.
so far you have slurred nazarenes and now the disciples by your association of them with YOUR approval of criminal law breaking and destruction of property. whose next? Baptists? Catholics? Come on chameleon, do another 'change over' for us.
Try it with gullible idiots who haven't read your pro islamic bunk before. They might be entertained by the chameleon act, for a while.
from your lips, to God's ears.
They're not mutually exclusive, I'm concerned about both.
They move to other countries for two reasons: because they want to forcibly change those countries to Muslim countries and because those countries allow them to.
Well how come then that I count 13 Brit-related posts on the first page of your "in forum" (which seem representative to me) and not one about the slaughter in NJ?
How many times (and you will recall that I did recently attempt to engage with you on a civilised basis, without response); why the fixation?
I believe it is in the interests of my compatriots to know the true attitude of the composite Brit man on the street towards America and Americans.
If we are going to survive, we need to be able to differentiate between our true friends, our adversaries, our enemies and our false friends.
The more information there is at hand, the easier it will be to determine where on that continuum the British people fall, and where the relationship is likely to be headed in the future.
It's the atmosphere, and what makes you think gay guys aren't also stimulated by such pictures ~ there are, after all, many, many, many things that stimulate those people ~ animals, cars, walking around, the sky, .....
>>
I've known several gay men and they'd laugh their bottoms off at your inference sir.
Its all about the members not the mammaries with homosexual men.
Your perceived need for answers in no way places a concomitant obligation on me to provide them to you.
Subject only to FR's PTB, I will post and/or reply as I see fit.
Have a nice day.
Well fair enough. You must be great fun at dinner parties.
Me too.
And I agree about the UK and BBC. The BBC has a worldwide audience for its Islamophile bunk. They fired Kilroy-Silk and kept Tom Paulin. Need I say more...
The only thing going right now in the UK is the gaining influence of the UKIP Party that is anti-EU. The Tories are very anti-US.
In fact, the comparison was with groups having "dress codes". The Catholic Church has a dress code for the "religious" and no personal would rationally believe mentioning Islam and Catholicism in the same paragraph constituted some sort of insult.
You're really going to have to try harder and stick to the facts if you want to win any debate points. So far you have NONE and I have them all!
Did you ever suspect the gay fellows you knew were telling you stories about NOT being aroused by various things? Hmmmm?!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.