Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wtc911
The joke in all this is the presumption of a ruling dynasty. The shah we all came to know and love came to power in a coup d'etat in 1953.

It's worse than that. The joke in this is the presumption of all ruling dynasties.

The shah is just the successor of the original pahlavi shah, Reza Khan, who was a military officer and minister of war under the last ghajar king, but who led a coup and crowned himself shah. The ghajar dynasty usurped the throne from the zand dynasty, and so on and so forth.

Iran's recent history seems to be nothing more than a series of rulers being imposed and deposed by various outside powers (such as Russia, Britain, and the U.S.) and internal revolts. Add in ambitious religous nutballs, and you have a real mess.

169 posted on 01/27/2005 2:26:03 PM PST by pillbox_girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]


To: pillbox_girl
Iran's recent history seems to be nothing more than a series of rulers being imposed and deposed by various outside powers (such as Russia, Britain, and the U.S.) and internal revolts. Add in ambitious religous nutballs, and you have a real mess.

____________________________________________________

And not one to which I would want to see US troops committed.

170 posted on 01/27/2005 2:46:07 PM PST by wtc911 ("I would like at least to know his name.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson