Skip to comments.
Contract on America: No-restraint GOP
The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review ^
| Saturday, January 22, 2005
| editorial
Posted on 01/22/2005 8:40:32 AM PST by Willie Green
House Republicans at the start of the new legislative session could have set a new, fiscally sound direction by endorsing a series of procedural rules aimed at curtailing federal spending.
Instead the House Republican Conference rejected virtually every commonsense measure that would fetter runaway spending, thereby opening the door to more federal excess. This, after the GOP last year vowed to control spending and restore budget sanity on Capitol Hill.
With no circuit breakers in place, discretionary spending will spike, just as it has over the last three fiscal years, which account for some of the biggest annual spending increases in the past four decades, according to the Cato Institute.
(Excerpt) Read more at pittsburghlive.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: 109th; biggovernment; budgetdeficit; debt; deficitspending; federalspending; rinos; spendspendspend; term2
And the WH will give rubberstamp approval to anything Congress spends...
the RINOs just can't plunder the Treasury fast enough.
To: Willie Green
Already posted, but thanks for your usual upbeat spin.
To: Always Right
Already posted, but thanks for your usual upbeat spin.No it's not, but thanks for your usual misinformed spin.
3
posted on
01/22/2005 8:51:45 AM PST
by
Willie Green
(Go Pat Go!!!)
To: Willie Green
We need to start phasing out farm subsidies for big agribusiness. IIRC, we're spending about 20 billion per year. We could reduce subsidies down to 5 billion where most goes to the poorest farmers.
There are a lot of things we could do. Bush needs to set up a commission like the social security that puts our government on a diet. Make it more efficient by cutting out the fat. That would also give investors more confidence that he's serious about reducing the deficit.
Any one remember that computer program that allowed you to figure out how to balance the congressional budget? I remember playing with one during the Clinton years.
To: Willie Green
Yes it has, but it was in a different paper with different title. Same verbage.
To: Always Right
Yes it has, but it was in a different paper with different title. Same verbage.Well the Tribune-Review presents it as an unsigned editorial and doesn't credit any other source.
So can you provide a link to the other thread so that we can verify your assertion?
6
posted on
01/22/2005 9:20:39 AM PST
by
Willie Green
(Go Pat Go!!!)
Comment #7 Removed by Moderator
To: Willie Green
To: Admin Moderator
Why was my comment removed? Is there some violation that I am not aware of regarding this source?
9
posted on
01/22/2005 1:02:11 PM PST
by
raybbr
To: raybbr
To: Admin Moderator
My bad. Sorry. I didn't realize it was the balance of the article.
11
posted on
01/22/2005 1:30:23 PM PST
by
raybbr
To: Willie Green
"And the WH will give rubberstamp approval to anything Congress spends... the RINOs just can't plunder the Treasury fast enough."
Agreed. The sad part is that the expenses also prohibit any cost saving by the government or the citizens ala the medicare prescription drug program.
12
posted on
01/22/2005 5:19:06 PM PST
by
JSteff
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson