The earth is approx. 6000 years old. That is what the Bible geneologies indicate, and that is what the physical evidence says.
If you use the preferred rock dating methods on newly cooled volcanic rocks in Hawaii, or Washington, it will tell you that those rocks are 300 million years old, so where is the credibility of the method? If you ask the psuedo-scientists why, they will simply assert that the test doesn't work on new rock; are you buying? Where is the common sense?
BTW, Darwin was a practicing occultist, until he became terminally ill, at which time he admitted that his theory had huge holes in it.
My God was and is powerful enough to do things exactly as he said in his word.
Still no word on how, exactly, the age of the earth, evolution, or natural selection negates the moral teachings of Christ, or how it entails taking another god before Him, or worshiping graven images. You, on the other hand, allow pride and worldliness to provoke you to malign a man who was by contemporary and historical accounts, a Christian and respected by his peers, even those who disagreed with him. He never claimed to have a hard-set theory -- his book, Origin of Species (have you read it? I have ...) was a chronicle of observations in his extensive travels and studies, and conclusions drawn from them, but he never, ever claimed to understand fully the workings of natural selection, so your information that he "admitted" to huge holes in his theory only on his death bed, is patently ridiculous.
Someone is leading you on, and it isn't the Bible, it isn't God -- it's MEN who sense a challenge to their power. By the way ... does the earth revolve around the sun, or is that pseudo science as well? Never mind. One can't take you seriously. God be with you.