Posted on 01/23/2005 6:06:08 AM PST by SJackson
The other day a news item stated that for the last 10 years the crime rate in the United States has been dropping, but the experts dont seem to know why.
Nothing in society is simple, and there are all kinds of factors operating at any one time, but one of the things the media and the so-called experts have apparently overlooked, consciously or unconsciously, is the plethora of new laws that allow law-abiding citizens to carry concealed weapons. Just a few decades ago, there were almost none, but today 37 states have right-to-carry laws on their lawbooks. Nine others, plus Washington, D.C., allow carrying with restrictions, and in the remaining four the right is denied.
In the meantime, as state after state considered easing carrying restrictions, gun phobics marched out their sordid descriptions of gunfights in bars and shootouts at traffic accidents. They never materialized. Still, they marched them out, again and again, every time another state considered a right-to-carry law despite the drop in crime that followed the passage of such laws in other states.
Why does right to carry result in reduced crime? In surveys of violent criminals, the number one thing they say they fear is not the police, who almost always get to the scene of a crime after its over, but an armed citizen. And in his book, More Guns, Less Crime, economist John Lott pointed out that in a county-by-county study of all 3,054 counties in the U.S., wherever gun restrictions are relaxed violent crime rates have dropped, with the greatest drops in the counties that had had the most crime. In adjoining states where right to carry was instituted in one state and not the other, crime in the counties in the right-to-carry states went down while, right across the border, crime in the state with restrictions generally went up.
Business and guns
Americans love their guns; and criminals, politicians, and businesses should bewareperhaps with good cause. The number of gun owners is significant. The website for Reason Magazine (www.reason.com) cites a Gallup poll taken in the year 2000. About 40 percent of Americans report having guns in their homes. This amounts to as many as 90 million gun owners, and the average gun owner owns about four guns.
When K-Mart hired Rosie ODonnell as a spokesperson, one of the first things I and several people I know did was to decide not to shop there anymore. A movement materialized on the Internet calling for a K-Mart boycott. Stores like K-Mart work on a very thin profit margin; it doesnt take a large percentage of their shoppers staying away or switching to a competitor to affect their profitability. In the United States, gun ownership is higher in rural rather than urban areas. It may not be coincidental that the least profitable of K-Marts stores became the rural ones and those are the ones K-Marts management decided to close on their way to bankruptcy.
In a country where 47 percent of men reported owning guns in their homes, Ace Hardware was committing economic suicide by having ODonnell as a spokesperson. I stopped shopping at the local Ace as did the publisher of this magazine, and a call on the Internet came out to boycott them until Ace suddenly dropped her. No reason was given, but the protest from customersmen, gun ownerswas likely the reason. Ace, at least, didnt have to confront bankruptcy.
Smith & Wesson, the gun manufacturer, caved in to the Clinton trigger locks and saw sales dramatically plunge as a boycott began and they, too, went bankrupt. The company now has new ownership and gun buyers have more or less forgiven the company. But the market reaction by gun owners was clear: Dont fool with our guns.
Politics and guns
George W. Bush is wishy-washy on guns, but John Kerry never saw an antigun bill he wouldnt sign. Nearing the end of the 2004 campaign, John Kerrys advisors saw the writing on the wall, but just a little too late. They saw he had to pick up some votes in the so-called red states and they suddenly had Kerry do a photo shoot looking for all the world like a hunter. But few were fooled and, just as its hard to tell how much of K-Marts bankruptcy was caused by gun owner boycotts, its difficult to tell how many voters that would have voted for Kerry either stayed home or voted for Bush just because of his antigun stance.
In the 2000 election, in several states where gun ownership was high, including Al Gores home state of Tennessee, Bush eked out victories over antigunner Gore by the slimmest of margins. Well never know how many votes Gore lost because of his antigun stance, but just a few percent in any one of at least five states would have swung the election to him.
Just as politicians, entertainers, and media types woefully underestimate the number of people who believe in God, despite the number of churches that dot the American landscape, they and many businesses continue to underestimate the number of Americans who believe in the Second Amendment and their right to bear arms and want the option to defend their families and themselves. They are blind to this despite the fact that there are more guns in this country than there are people. And these shortsighted people will continue to pay the price for their lack of vision in the future.
Any time a firearms-related thread is created on FreeRepublic, please be sure to add the "banglist" keyword to it so that interested FReepers don't miss it.
Let Freedom Ring,
Right !!
I would believe that is a median number NOT an average. I know very few people that own just one gun.
The casual owners normally have a revolver or pistol, a shot gun, a .22 rifle and a hunting rifle.
Collectors own a LOT more. The four gun average may be of ALL adults, gun owners or not.
I have more guns than I probably need but not as many as I want.
BANG!
I think it's hard to generalize. I know lots of folks with no long guns at all. I know others with only shotguns, often only one. Of course I also know folks with several safes full of guns of all types. One guy had over a dozen AR-15 type rifles. Another has several M-1 Carbines, a few pistols, an M-2 Carbine, an M-79 and a belt fed machine gun. :)
In the United States, gun ownership by non-felons is higher in rural rather than urban areas.
There, that's better.
Guns? What guns? I lost all mine in that tragic boating accident.
Yeah, that was tragic.
I lost all of mine when someone broke into my house and stole them.
Probably buried them somewhere, but I have no idea where.
I disagree that President Bush has been wishy washy on guns. One of his first actions after being elected to his first term was to select John Ashcroft as Attorney General. One of the President's and Ashcroft's first moves was to publicaly state that the policy of the United States was that the Bill of Rights gave Americans the Right to keep and bear Arms. That was a complete reversal of the Clinton ADministration which had 8 years of trying to abolish that right. There was a big case in Texas where the Clinton appointed Attorney General said that Americans did nto ahve that right.
As for the Assault Weapons Ban, I believe President Bush called for that to be sent to him by the Senate only becauase he dind't believe there was support for it and that removed that argument from teh Democrats in teh election. I'll give him that one as his overall stance has been to strengthen our rights to defend ourselves.
Of note, one of the only states that I know of that has publically said its citizens do NOT have a right to defend themsleves is Massachusetts. They are following the UK model and while they have not outlawed guns entirely.....I wouldn't move back there with the hopes of keeping mine. Its shameful what Kerry and kennedy have done to the state where our fight for freedom began....
Nice link to that Gun Facts.pdf
thanks
A week from next Thursday . . .
:-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.