Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bosco
The result was a tempest. I cited Thomas Cahill's work "How the Irish Saved Civilization" for the human sacrifice angle and that got me lots of invective but no good refutations of his data.

That's the problem with debating religion, period. Invective is pretty much the pinacle of the debate. Few minds are ever changed. The older and wiser I become, the more I realize that if conversion is possible it has to come from love, not debate.

68 posted on 01/23/2005 1:23:38 PM PST by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Melas
That's the problem with debating religion, period. Invective is pretty much the pinacle of the debate. Few minds are ever changed. The older and wiser I become, the more I realize that if conversion is possible it has to come from love, not debate.

Sometimes it's a loving thing to point out to a person that they aren't consistent with what they believe, or that that there are holes in their world view that they may not have considered. Jesus engaged in debates with religious leaders of His day and He essentially said "It isn't about religion, it's about a relationship between you and God, not how many religious duties you have performed."

That being said, what's a soft atheist?

109 posted on 01/23/2005 6:31:59 PM PST by Bosco (Remember how you felt on September 11?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson