Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Some See Risks as Republicans Revel in Power
NYTIMES ^ | 01/24/05 | ADAM NAGOURNEY and RICHARD W. STEVENSON

Posted on 01/23/2005 7:38:52 PM PST by Pikamax

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: jveritas

there=they


21 posted on 01/23/2005 8:01:39 PM PST by jveritas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
Some See Risks as Republicans Revel in Power

Some See Risks if Howling Moonbats and Traitors Like Democrats Ever Get Into Power Again

22 posted on 01/23/2005 8:03:07 PM PST by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

NYT is sowing the seeds of doubt.

The only people worried is the left (democrats).

Is it possible the Republicans are FINALLY acting as the majority party that they are and have been for some years?

Is if finally possible that Republicans are FINALLY starting to take over in the unelected agency offices of the government?

The NYT does not report news, they direct spin. Why would they write this now if not to protect the left?


23 posted on 01/23/2005 8:03:39 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Javelina
The far left whackos control the process - they are getting more and more hysterical and are having more and more power. I think your concerns are unjustified but understandable because you are a well reasoned thinker that would make the right decisions in a candidate. Trust me, they don't have reason on their side - they have emotions. They are mad. They demand power. And the democrats have to cater to every whim of constituency in their battled conglomerate of misfits and diversity groups.

Don't throw logic into their equation. There is no logic. They will use the same old play book - scare seniors, worst economy since..., racism, and mean republicans want your children to drink dirty water.

It isn't going to change.

We could use someone more conservative really. Every time someone runs on a conservative platform - they win. Works every time.
24 posted on 01/23/2005 8:03:57 PM PST by commonguymd (My impatience is far more advanced than any known technology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

"Still, Terry McAuliffe, the Democratic National Committee chairman, disputed the long-term meaning of the gains, arguing Democrats would have won the White House had 60,000 votes shifted in Ohio, and said Mr. Bush had enjoyed a "huge advantage" because of the attacks of Sept. 11."

Too bad Terry's on his way out, he's been so entertaining, not to mention helpful for Republicans!


25 posted on 01/23/2005 8:04:09 PM PST by Theresawithanh (2005! My resolution: FReep even MORE this year!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Javelina

Hillary has an absolute zero charisma and she projects zero leadership. She cannot win the Presidential election, it is impossible.


26 posted on 01/23/2005 8:04:40 PM PST by jveritas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

"Knowing what we know now, the presidential election of 2008 is probably a tossup."

So is the election of 2032. So? I don't see the point of this comment.


27 posted on 01/23/2005 8:04:42 PM PST by AVNevis (You are never too young to stand up for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: commonguymd

"Every time someone runs on a conservative platform - they win. Works every time."

Bill Jones beat Boxer in California?


28 posted on 01/23/2005 8:06:03 PM PST by AVNevis (You are never too young to stand up for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: AVNevis

Bill jones was a bad candidate from what I hear. I guess you can be a bad candidate on a good platform and lose.


29 posted on 01/23/2005 8:07:14 PM PST by commonguymd (My impatience is far more advanced than any known technology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: commonguymd
Bill Jones was not only a bad candidate, he was non-existant. Never did campaign the whole state very much...no $$.

I'm thinking for the primaries we will again see the power struggle...Clinton vs Kerry (Kennedy) and someone else will emerge from the scuffle.

30 posted on 01/23/2005 8:10:47 PM PST by CAluvdubya (From the RED part of California)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
If any one is long in the tooth, its the Left, whose dominance in American life is fading.

Yes, it sounded like some sort of wishful thinking on the part of this leftist that the conservative "cycle" is growing a bit too old. I attribute the fascination of the public with big government to be a function of those who credited FDR with ending the Depression, and as the voters who remembered and liked the New Deal started dying off in the mid 1970's, we have entered a more conservative time. Even Clinton tried to co-opt the language of conservatism to fool under-50% "majorities" into voting for him.

The Baby Boomers have no memory of FDR, but they do remember Reagan's "Morning in America". They'll also live a lot longer than their parents' generation, and will keep the GOP in power for a long time.

31 posted on 01/23/2005 8:13:48 PM PST by hunter112 (Total victory, both in the USA and the Middle East!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
Some See Risks as Republicans Revel in Power

I don't recall similar articles when the Dems were in power for so many years.

I guess the author of the article will feel better when the Democratic overlords return. Get a life!

32 posted on 01/23/2005 8:15:08 PM PST by Lawgvr1955 (Never draw to an inside straight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zarf

Wow, the NYT is late to the bandwagon, who would have thunk it. These articles were out last week and this spin was put on by the MSM during the innauguration as well. It was as if there never was a campaign. These issues were beaten and beaten and beaten like a dead horse. IRAQ=VIETNAM was the central theme of the Kerry campaign. "Growing unease about Iraq," gimme a freaking break. The majority of the voters did not buy the Iraq is Vietnam shyt during the campaign and they are not buying it now. Pure MSM self delusion.

It is interesting to note that as the Iraqi elections draw near, our media is turning up (if that were even possible) the IRAQ=VIETNAM heat. Perhaps the MSM is getting desperate because they know Iragi elections are a significant accomplishment and the MSM views this as the last chance to damage Bush on this issue. Meanwhile, Zarqawi releases a 90 minute screed railing against the elections and ups the violence. Perhaps he is getting desperate because he knows Iraqi elections are a significant accomplishment and this could be the last chance to derail them. Oh, the parallels in thinking never cease to amaze.


33 posted on 01/23/2005 8:15:43 PM PST by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

"overhauling Social Security and the tax code - those issues, if handled incorrectly, could undercut Mr. Bush's long-term goal for the party. "

Oh sure, we politians should just sit on our a$$ and do nothing in order to maintain power. This is why W aint no ordinary pol.


34 posted on 01/23/2005 8:35:28 PM PST by LA Conservative (Peace Kills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

We can't achieve peace, we cannot have democractic societies, we cannot reform S.S., we cannot overhaul the tax code, we cannot stop junk lawsuits, we cannot appoint constructionist judges...why we might as well give up.

No Dice. We aren't playing around anymore. Sooner the editoralists and politicians in D.C. understand we're through complaining without results the better for them. We have a President that doesn't give a damn what people say, he'll pursue it if he believes it is right. Sometimes we agree, sometimes we don't, but at least he can be counted upon to take these issues on despite the naysayers.

The electorate is rapidly becoming articulate, well informed and activists on a local level. The days of slacking off on our dime are coming to an end.



35 posted on 01/23/2005 8:40:20 PM PST by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
I'm more afraid of having Neo-Progs* take over, than I am of having Republicans in charge.

*Neo-Progs rhymes with Neo-Frogs
and stands for Neo-Progressives

36 posted on 01/23/2005 9:23:58 PM PST by syriacus (Former staunch Democrat - 'til the party + the press manhandled a Judicial Nominee, Clarence Thomas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson