Posted on 01/24/2005 9:03:23 AM PST by areafiftyone
CBS News? LOL LOL LOL
Answer the damn questions. The truth shall set you free. When you're honest with yourself, you'll make CBS and 60 Minutes look like complete assclowns.
(Yawn) Another day, another '60 Minutes' hit piece against a Republican. Fortunately, nobody can trust CBS anymore.
They just don't get it---and neither does Drudge: people DON'T CARE what "60 Minutes" or ANY of the MSM say anymore. They are irrelevant, totally and completely.
SEE..SEE..SEE!!!! They're different.
#18. I stopped watching the MSM, years ago. So you know what my answer is to your question. A most emphatic, NO!!!!
Best FReegards,
D2
CBS = Communists Bull Sh*t!!!!:-(
ABC = ALL Bullsh*t Communists!!!!:-(
NBC = Nothing BUT Communists!!!!:-(
CNN = Communists News Network!!!!:-(
CNBC = Communists, Nothing But Communists!!!!:-(
MSNBC = Mathews S*cks Nothing But Communists!!!!:-(
TBS = TASS Bull Sh*t!!!!:-(
PBS = PRAVDA Bull Sh*t!!!!:-(
C-SPAN1 = Communists-Socialists Pandering *ssholes Network#1!!!!:-(
C-SPAN2 = Communists-Socialists Pandering *ssholes Network#2!!!!:-(
Fairweather Whichever Way The Wind Blows(Including AND Especially, O'Reilly)FOX, sometimes Rocks!!!!:-|
The Mighty Maja Rushie, Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity Rules the Airwaves!!!!:-)
AND Free Republic IS The Best News Network!!!!:-)
Best FReegards,
D2 :-)
My favorite Stahl story---she was interviewed on a Frontline piece about the Reagan precidency. She said when she was reassigned as CBS WH correspondent, she was invited along with her husband to a little meeting with the President. She said Reagan seemed out of it, disinterested in everyone around him, all but used the word senile to describe him. until she told Pres Reagan that her husband had some connection to Hollywood at which point Reagan "came alive'. Just a dumb actor, after all. I laugh to this day that she thought polite disinterest in her was a sign of senility.
Most of the said News Networks in my post #27 get their marching orders from these two organizations:
http://www.cpusa.org/
and:
http://www.dsausa.org/
That's why I do not watch the MSM anymore to get my news.
Best FReegards,
D2
I don't watch the font challenged but some of us have to be future Buckheads I suppose.
***.... okay, I don't actually have 5 bucks, but I can get it.***
LOL! I can manage to loan you four. (At a modest interest)
Tom and Christine have spent years and years of their lives working for adopted children. They have adopted several of their own. It's a perfectly appropriate and natural response by Rep. Delay.
Please refresh my memory. Who was the young democratic go-getter who used these phrases? Wasn't it a young black female lawyer during the Clinton impeachment trials? I remember hearing this, and some of the initial mainstream reaction was, I think, that a star had been born. yet I can't remember her name!
See number 33.
Please see post #27 and #29 in regards to this thread.
D2
:-)
No credibility, NONE.
Am I the only one who finds the humor in the last names of the subjects involved in this story being synonomous????
Tom Delay is a politician.. There is no such thing as "truth" to a politician..
And it will definitely not "set him free"..
Check out the following..
---------------------------------------------------
But there’s this problem with Texas law. Since 1905, it’s been against state law to raise or spend corporate money in Texas. And DeLay’s Texas PAC raised three-quarters of a million corporate dollars. They reported their corporate contributions only with the IRS in Washington, avoiding disclosure to the state agency that regulates elections in Texas. Ronnie Earle, a D.A. with statewide prosecutorial authority, caught them. He also found they were doing some odd things with their money, like sending $190,000 corporate “soft” dollars to the Republican National State Election Committee in Washington in exchange for $190,000 non-corporate “hard” dollars that can be legally spent in Texas. DeLay insists he had little to do with Texans for a Republican Majority, which seems odd since he founded it. And the PAC’s Texas director said under oath that DeLay was consulted on PAC activities. DeLay has said he raised no corporate money himself, but a June 24, 2002, letter I found in the exhibits of a civil suit filed in Austin suggests otherwise:
------------------------------------------------
Now, you can say what you like, but I don't give a d**n whether he's lib or con, if he's breaking the law, he's breaking the law, and no better than any other politician..
Or, average citizen..
I don't cotton to a privileged elite in congress, and I expect them to swing for their crimes like everyone else..
See my #13, #27 and #29 responses on this thread.
Best FReegards,
D2
:-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.