Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wild, Wild World of Animal Rights(Abortion is okay, but we cannot tolerate prize fish and blue cows)
The American Prowler ^ | 1/25/2005 | Christopher Orlet

Posted on 01/25/2005 2:18:45 AM PST by nickcarraway

Twelve years ago, the Liberal British MP Lord Alton quit the House of Commons largely because his party supported abortion on demand, but opposed the use of goldfish as fairground prizes. The depravity of the situation was too much even for a liberal parliamentarian. The lord resigned forthwith. The goldfish controversy was back the other week as the ruling Labour Party considered a ban on animals as competition prizes. After an intense debate that must have resembled a Monty Python skit, ministers decided that with elections coming up they would look very silly indeed if they pressed for the goldfish ban.

Similarly the animal rights group People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals appeared rather silly after it recently lost its appeal to halt a California Milk Producers Advisory Board's "Happy Cows" advertising campaign. PETA objected to the campaign's tag line "Great Cheese comes from Happy Cows. Happy Cows come from California."

PETA attempted to sue the Milk Board for false advertising, insisting that California cows are no happier than Iowa cows or even, God help them, Missouri Bootheel cows. This seems logical. Besides, what patriotic Iowan or Missourian wants to be told that livestock of some other state -- especially California--are more contented than his own simply by virtue of where they graze? Research indicates that a multiplicity of factors account for happiness: health, wealth, access to knowledge, equality, and personal freedom. Environment is far down on the list. Few of these factors, however, concern cows overly much.

So far as I know there have been no surveys to determine where the happiest people (or animals) in the U.S. live. But such polls have been undertaken in Europe. The surprise winner: the Belgian port city of Antwerp. Yes, Antwerps are very happy indeed. Happier than their Dutch neighbors who have legalized both pot and prostitution.

Despite a life expectancy of 50 years, periodic droughts, rampant AIDS, a poverty level of 60 percent, frequent Muslim-Christian conflicts, and an unstable government, the happiest people in the world, according to a 2003 World Values Survey, are the Nigerians. Of course, no one bothered to survey Nigerian cattle, but I suspect native cows are rather unhappy about their homeland's continuing loss of pasture lands to desertification, soil degradation, rapid deforestation, water pollution, and near constant oil spills.

PETA maintains that most milch cows, regardless of where they dwell, live Hobbesian lives that are nasty, brutish and short, and the California government's propaganda was actually a devious plot meant to mislead the lactose tolerant. Despite the soundness of this argument, PETA's suit was dismissed on a technicality. It seems one cannot sue a government agency under the California Unfair Business Practices Act. Thus the American public missed out on yet another silly and no doubt highly amusing spectacle.

Scientific researchers are making great progress in many areas, but they are woefully behind in their research on fish stress and bovine contentment. Perhaps because they have other priorities: like safer breast implants. PETA, however, claims to recognize a wretched or a contented critter when it sees one. That is a useful and significant trait to have, especially if, like me, you share quarters with a large, ornery tomcat. Perhaps the folks at PETA can have a look at my feline friend and tell me what on earth I have done to offend him. Do I not clean up after him? Do I not allow him to stay rent-free? Haven't I fed and fussed over him? Was it something I said?

Now that the appeals court has dismissed PETA's case, the justices are free to take up other significant issues. Here's my suggestion. Perhaps they can investigate why California taxpayers are spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to advertise milk.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: California; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: abortion; animalrights; cows; england; goldfish; labour; peta; prolife

1 posted on 01/25/2005 2:18:46 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Stick all those peta people on a deserted island with no food. Put a chicken and a pig on there with them.

We can make bets on how long it will take them to toss their convictions out the window and eat them.


2 posted on 01/25/2005 2:25:57 AM PST by Nuzcruizer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Perhaps they can investigate why California taxpayers are spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to advertise milk.

Good idea! I'm getting very tired of the government using MY money to try to sell me on socialism.

3 posted on 01/25/2005 4:38:25 AM PST by Tax-chick (Wielder of the Dread Words of Power, "Bless your heart, honey!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
animals are property

PETA are fools

4 posted on 01/25/2005 5:48:01 AM PST by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nuzcruizer

Good idea. :)

Survivor: PETA version!


5 posted on 01/25/2005 8:37:39 AM PST by 4mycountry (This is my tag. Deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson