Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jonestown
"Congress shall make no law" meant what it said, but did not mean that only Congress was so restricted.

Why not? That's what it says, "Congress", not the states.

155 posted on 01/26/2005 12:16:40 PM PST by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]


To: Dan Evans
True, our Constitution, in Art VI, explicitly establishes that it cannot be breached by any government entity.
-- Fed/State or local, ALL officials are pledged to support the US Constitution and its Amendments as the supreme Law of the Land.

"Congress shall make no law" meant what it said, but did not mean that only Congress was so restricted.

Why not? That's what it says, "Congress", not the states.

Art VI, and the rest of my comment explains "why not". -- Did you bother to try to understand them?

The 10th made clear that States were also prohibited powers, among them the power to infringe on peoples RKBA's.
After the civil war, southern States were denying freed slaves the RKBA's, under the pretense that the BOR's did not apply. The 14th was ratified to end that controversy.

193 posted on 01/26/2005 2:10:04 PM PST by jonestown ( A fanatic is a person who can't change his mind and won't change the subject." ~ Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson