Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Try, Try Again (National Review's editors endorse Washington State's ReVote effort)
National Review ^ | January 28, 2005 | NR Editors

Posted on 01/28/2005 6:38:48 PM PST by Stoat

Try, Try Again


By NR Editors

EDITOR'S NOTE: This editorial appears in the February 14, 2005, issue of National Review.

We have generally decried the recent trend toward attempts to settle elections after the fact in the courts. But the voting controversy in Washington State is a special case. As Byron York reports elsewhere in [the Feb. 14 issue of NR], it is impossible to know who truly won the Washington gubernatorial race between Republican Dino Rossi and Democrat Christine Gregoire. Gregoire has just taken office, having overtaken Rossi in a second recount. Her winning margin: 129 votes out of 2.8 million votes cast. Rossi had won the initial post-election-day count by 261 votes, and the first machine recount by 42 votes. Throughout the process, Gregoire has been helped by the ability of heavily Democratic King County (home to Seattle) to produce new batches of uncounted votes, including 573 supposedly mistakenly disqualified ballots that gave Gregoire her winning margin.

 

Rossi has filed a contest of the election in state court, as allowed by the state constitution. (He chose not to pursue action in federal court using the fanciful equal-protection arguments that are the unfortunate spawn of Bush v. Gore.) The exact standard he will have to meet will be decided by the judge, but at the very least he will have to prove that the number of ballots accounted for by fraud, error, or illegal votes exceeds Gregoire's margin of victory. At 129, and with plenty of questionable ballots in King County alone, he should meet any reasonable test on this score. Then, the judge will have a number of remedies, including a statewide re-vote. That is the option favored by Rossi, who argues that the vote-counting process has been so chaotic and mishandled that no one can assume the governorship except under a debilitating cloud of doubt. 

He is right. The painstaking precinct-by-precinct analysis of blogger Stefan Sharkansky at soundpolitics.com shows that in King County alone, there are 3,700 unaccounted-for ballots or voters. Some precincts have more ballots than voters, for a total of 2,900 "extra" ballots. Other precincts have more voters than ballots, for a total of 800 "extra" voters. These mystery voter-less ballots and ballot-less votes obviously are enough in themselves to put Gregoire's 129-vote margin in serious doubt.

Other irregularities abound. The Seattle Times has reported that 129 felons voted in King and Pierce counties. At least 348 provisional ballots — which are supposed to be closely inspected to see if they are legitimate — were directly fed into machines and counted in King County. Some 55,000 optical-scan ballots (ballots on which the voter marks a bubble) in King County were "enhanced" so that the voters' supposed intent could be determined, with no uniform standard governing the process. Roughly 500 voters used the address of the King County Administration building as their home address.

This all makes for an irrecoverable mess that Kirby Wilbur and other Washington state talk-radio hosts, the Wall Street Journal's John Fund, and above all Sharkansky have helped expose. Even Dean Logan, the Democratic director of elections in King County, when asked if we will ever know who got more votes, has said, "Statewide, you know I think that perhaps we'll never know the answer to that because of it being as close as it is."

There are reasonable grounds for considering a re-vote unwise. York advances a few of them in his article. What precedent would it set? But elections this razor-close are extremely rare, and re-votes have happened before. As Fund points out, North Carolina is about to have a statewide re-vote in an agriculture-commissioner race. The trend toward litigated election results is already well underway and there seems little chance of stopping it. It may be that Rossi will hurt his political future by seeming to be a sore loser in this race. But that judgment is for him to make. If he believes the principle of upholding the integrity of Washington's election process is more important than the political risk he runs, so be it.

There is, as many have noted, something to be said for finality in an election. We agree. But the only way to get it in this case is to tighten up procedures, and vote again.
 


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: governorrossi; revote; washington; washingtonstate

1 posted on 01/28/2005 6:38:51 PM PST by Stoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Took them long enough to get on board.

I guess that's easy for me to say, living in Washington state and seeing it all firsthand, but still.

Anyhow, pretty good article. It doesn't mention the double votes, or the fact that the 129 felon votes are undoubtedly understated, it's probably upward of 300, but oh well.


2 posted on 01/28/2005 7:37:26 PM PST by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Rossi doesn't run any risk of appearing to be a sore loser. Quite the opposite. He will look like a fool if he rolls over and takes this crap, Christine is the loser for even entertaining the thought of planting her butt in the gov's chair. When everybody and their farm animals know the gig is up on this democrat heist, Rossi has nothing to fear from the good citizens of Washington.


3 posted on 01/28/2005 7:41:38 PM PST by whereasandsoforth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
Posted already.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1330887/posts

4 posted on 01/28/2005 7:55:27 PM PST by Publius (The people of a democracy choose the government they want, and they ought to get it good and hard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whereasandsoforth
Funny, The reactions I have seen from the left are more all "pubbies" are sore losers that should "move on" rather than focusing on Rossi.

And discontent was immediate and is growing for Fraudoire - even among her party faithful. It is my job to maximize on that!

Every poll that has been taken has shown a clear and strong favor for Rossi over Fraudoire in both the "Coulda - Shoulda" category (Who really won) and the Wouldya - Willya" category (Who will you vote for if there is a re-vote). EVERY poll.

Win, lose or draw, you're seeing political history being made....
5 posted on 01/28/2005 7:57:23 PM PST by rockrr (Revote or Revolt! It's up to you Washington!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
A democrat in the position Rossi is in would never hesitate to call for a re-election and have the full support of the msm as well screaming in outrage that the republican stold the election through fraud, and vice.

Rossi, Go For It, man.

6 posted on 01/28/2005 8:29:45 PM PST by harpo11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius

That's a shame. Even now after I posted the article with the original text leading the title line, it still doesn't show up on a FR article search, just as it didn't show up when I searched prior to posting. Oh well.


7 posted on 01/28/2005 8:32:48 PM PST by Stoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: harpo11

Quite true, ask yourself this...

Had Gore won Florida in 2000, won the automated recount, and then, after a heavily Republican county "found" enough votes to put Bush over the top, lost - does anyone think he would have played nice and forgone a court challenge?

No way.

In fact even though the only count he ever won was a tally of Florida State Supreme Court justices, he used every tool at his disposal.


8 posted on 01/28/2005 8:35:51 PM PST by swilhelm73 (Appeasers believe that if you keep on throwing steaks to a tiger, the tiger will become a vegetarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
Even now after I posted the article with the original text leading the title line, it still doesn't show up on a FR article search

Did you get bit by this? (I have.)
Limitations: Only article titles can be searched and words with three or fewer letters are not searched at all.

9 posted on 01/28/2005 10:20:51 PM PST by Mike Fieschko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko
I hadn't been aware of this....thanks very much for bringing it to my attention.


10 posted on 01/28/2005 10:34:42 PM PST by Stoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
Revote! If its good enough for Ukraine, its good enough for Washington State. Revote Now!

Denny Crane: "I want two things. First God and then Fox News."

11 posted on 01/28/2005 10:37:37 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Weekend BTTT


12 posted on 01/29/2005 2:10:22 PM PST by JDoutrider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson